Why bother
posted on 11/7/12
Australia got lucky, very lucky, England should be number 1 in the ODI format. I for one think the ICC should call for an emergency meeting, and make either RSA or England number 1 because how this shiite team is number 1 is beyond me!
posted on 11/7/12
only by two points
120, 118, 118,
Unsure when the next ODI is - presumably post the tests v SA
Then it'll get corrected...one way or another
posted on 11/7/12
England only need to win two more ODI games I think and they are number 1... So they're are five ODI games v RSA, after the test matches... win the ODI series with a two game difference and number 1 in all forms!!!
A shame because had that Birmingham game gone ahead, England would've won and number 1 would be England's!
posted on 11/7/12
Have any other team been number 1 in all three forms?
posted on 11/7/12
*at the same time?
posted on 11/7/12
If we win 3-2 or 2-1 will we both go above Australia..?
same for SA I guess
posted on 11/7/12
Don't think anyone has been number 1 in all forms.
I think you have to win by a two game difference because had you played Australia they would've lost points and you would've gained... So, now you're not playing them you have to win two games... I think I may be chatting a load of shiite
posted on 11/7/12
once
Hey ho - it's a theory eh..
posted on 11/7/12
The man of the series is chosen by the opposing team's coach. Clearly the Aussie coach saw Bell as the biggest thorn in their side.
posted on 11/7/12
To be fair going by these ICC rankings they may turn around and say you have to win 5-0 now to be number 1