anyone know who it is?

lee croft...article further down....

My guess that the player (a) high profile, or more importantly (b) foreign.

It was Lee Croft against one of the ball boys.

Yeah. A nobody from a league one team should receive the same attention as 2 famous international players, one being the England captain and from two of the biggest clubs in the world

Paisleys.

John Terry's case received just as much attention as Suarez's case. Nothing to do with being foreign

"John Terry's case received just as much attention as Suarez's case."


Absolute nonsense.

Of course it did. Look at the stripping of the England captaincy for starters.

The fact he got a lesser ban, which is utterly ridiculous by the way, made even more headlines

I would expect stories from the lower divisions to get less attention, to be fair.

The FA's "campaign" is a vanity-project anyway, to demonstrate that they're the world's top anti-racists.
In the past year, they've done four people under Regulation E3(2)......Suarez (Liverpool), Frimpong (Arsenal) Ferdinand (United), Terry (Chelsea),

All high-profile clubs. If the context of the allegation is on the pitch,.....more publicity (in the Suarez case, something close to hysteria). If it's done on Twitter...much more low-profile, for reasons which don't make any rational sense to me, because it's the same offence. (You could argue that it's worse).

But nothing about Bernstein's campaign has ever been rational, and I think it's done more harm than good.

It's generated huge clouds of hot air and negative publicity, for an issue that David James says he barely ever witnessed in his entire career in the game, and thinks is agenda-driven by people who are paid to whip up a storm to demonstarte the necessity of their jobs.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator