BHOP CALZAGHE II

Roy was a great fighter but he was chinned and had a low punch output.

Calzaghe pressure hand speed and reflexes make it a competitive fight.

But all that is irrelevant, he didn't fight him, so lets not give credit on what we don't know, only on what we know.

Not worth it. Calzaghe has retired undefeated and has nothing to prove, he's retired a legend.

Too many fighters can't deal with retirement eg Hatton and it's just embarrasing.

he aint a legend he's the luckiest fraud in the history of boxing. Guy was seriously nothing special. RJJ and BHop would've KOd him in early rounds before 2004.
He also ducked a load of other fighters

calzaghe needs to accept the challenge and stop being a biiitch

BHop was offered big money when he was the middleweight kingpin but he turned it down and instead decided to fight blown up welters.

And Joe did beat a prime, during that time Hopkins beat Tarver, Pavlik and Wright, his best series of wins.

Hopkins had his chance and on that performance he didn't deserve a rematch.

You might of had a argument if you said that Robin Reid deserved a rematch, but even then Calzaghe has long since retired, a legend.

Hopkins has proved that he was far from over the hill when he fought Joe.

Calzaghe is a boxing legend, which you're just going to have to deal with. His record proves it

Calzaghe is a boxing legend, which you're just going to have to deal with. His record proves it
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those who disagree I can only imagine just dislike the guy.

calzaghe is no legend - and ur all deluded if u think he is

Just another Yank Calzaghe hater.

He doesn't need to come out of retirement to beat a fighter he already beat you fool.

he didn't beat him on my card

knocked down, slap punched 99% of the time against bhop who decided to troll all fight instead of actually box, and probably had paid judges