or to join or start a new Discussion

Browse: Motorsport  Formula One 
347 Comments
Article Rating 2.33 Stars

RED BULL NOTHING WITHOUT VETTEL ?

bonjourno peeps ---

statistics ----- there"s a word to ponder ,
statistics would suggest that red bull would be in a sorry state without the mercurial vettel these past 5 years in fact red bull never won a bean until vettel joined them for 09 ,
lets also consider mark webber who has always been one of the fastest drivers on the grid that has had the better of every team mate he has ever been teamed up with, that includes drivers of the calibre of nico rosberg , coulthard , heidfeld , has for the large part never extracted the same performance from his red bulls as vettel has which would seem to prove that it is vettel and vettel alone making the difference at red bull -

lets also consider the 2011 mclaren which had the beating of webber and was a very good match for the red bull yet once again vettel and vettel alone decimated both of the mclaren drivers in there equally competitive with red bull machines ,
lets also consider the 2012 red bull that was never the quickest car on the grid yet vettel and vettel alone by a mixture of intelligence , race craft and blinding pace joined the ranks of all the time greats with his third WDC that year -

for me the most impressive aspect of vettel is his intelligence in and out of the car , not to mention the bollox he showed when demonstrating and then telling red bull where to shuv there team orders ,
something that no other current driver has ever had the bollox to replicate with there respective teams which suggests to me that he has more guts than any of the current drivers and also knows he is indispensable at red bull and he knows that horner and co also know that he is indispensable
------------------------------------ any thoughts

posted on 11/12/14

"you could"nt make this stuff up "

Are we talking about your lack of knowledge of what a PU is here? Or are we talking about your naivety at how nice Mercedes would be to McLaren?

posted on 11/12/14

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 35 minutes ago
"you could"nt make this stuff up"

Are we talking about your lack of knowledge of what a PU is here? Or are we talking about your naivety at how nice Mercedes would be to McLaren?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

mclaren dont have any knowledge of the merc PU -

we have all said daft things on here but that is something else completely

posted on 11/12/14

comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 35 minutes ago
"you could"nt make this stuff up"

Are we talking about your lack of knowledge of what a PU is here? Or are we talking about your naivety at how nice Mercedes would be to McLaren?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

mclaren dont have any knowledge of the merc PU -

we have all said daft things on here but that is something else completely


=======================================

Where have I ever said McLaren have no knowledge of the Mercedes PU?

We're talking specifics here, what makes the Mercedes PU stand out from the rest, the kind of things Mercedes would do their all to protect.

If we're talking daft things I'm afraid you're leading the way by a country mile. Debating PU's with me for days, taking on my Control Electronics arguments over and over only to then tell me,

"so how do mercedes know what the " control electronics" are outputting if not by a computer that mclaren can see -
------------------ not really sure what the control electronics are or even if there is such a thing but never mind -"

To coin a phrase, you could"nt make this stuff up

Know what all the parts of the PU do yet? realised that Mercedes choose what McLaren get to see?

posted on 11/12/14

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 35 minutes ago
"you could"nt make this stuff up"

Are we talking about your lack of knowledge of what a PU is here? Or are we talking about your naivety at how nice Mercedes would be to McLaren?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

mclaren dont have any knowledge of the merc PU -

we have all said daft things on here but that is something else completely


=======================================

Where have I ever said McLaren have no knowledge of the Mercedes PU?

We're talking specifics here, what makes the Mercedes PU stand out from the rest, the kind of things Mercedes would do their all to protect.

If we're talking daft things I'm afraid you're leading the way by a country mile. Debating PU's with me for days, taking on my Control Electronics arguments over and over only to then tell me,

"so how do mercedes know what the " control electronics" are outputting if not by a computer that mclaren can see -
------------------ not really sure what the control electronics are or even if there is such a thing but never mind -"

To coin a phrase, you could"nt make this stuff up

Know what all the parts of the PU do yet? realised that Mercedes choose what McLaren get to see?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
mclaren have no knowledge of the engine that powered there car during 2014 -

it gets funnier every time i say it

posted on 11/12/14

I'm glad it amuses you Martial

Anyone said it in particular or is it another one of your personal quotes along with "not really sure what the control electronics are or even if there is such a thing but never mind "

Got anything to say for yourself about that little gem

posted on 11/12/14

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 21 seconds ago
I'm glad it amuses you Martial

Anyone said it in particular or is it another one of your personal quotes along with "not really sure what the control electronics are or even if there is such a thing but never mind "

Got anything to say for yourself about that little gem


----------------------------------------------------------------------
mclaren have no knowledge of the engine that powered there car during 2014 -

------------ that is the gem among gems on here and quite possibly the biggest gem that has ever been on any F1 forum -
--------------------------------- ever

posted on 11/12/14

Then please do tell Martial, who has said that, let us all be in on the joke

Or is this another little fib to get out of your "not really sure what the control electronics are or even if there is such a thing but never mind " conundrum

I see you're running away from F1 debate and into childish games again

posted on 11/12/14

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 7 minutes ago
Then please do tell Martial, who has said that, let us all be in on the joke

Or is this another little fib to get out of your "not really sure what the control electronics are or even if there is such a thing but never mind " conundrum

I see you're running away from F1 debate and into childish games again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so what are you actually disagreeing about if you agree with me that mclaren had a substantial knowledge of the merc PU -
------------------- all i have ever said is they would have had enough knowledge to have sent honda useful information of the unit -
--------------------------------- it really is that simple

posted on 11/12/14

You keep on changing your tune Martial, I just said it on the other thread, you're falling apart at every seam.

Substantial knowledge now, We've jumped from no knowledge, through reasonable knowledge to substantial. If you're going to have an argument mate you're going to have to pick one thing to argue. It's just amusing if you keep on changing your tune every 5 seconds

You know what I've been arguing, I've reminded you 8 times in this thread already. If you didn't want to get into that argument you shouldn't have, I never forced you. Your simple inability to counter my points means perhaps my points were right. After all you have no idea about PU's so why get into a debate about them

posted on 11/12/14

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 19 hours, 46 minutes ago
You keep on changing your tune Martial, I just said it on the other thread, you're falling apart at every seam.

Substantial knowledge now, We've jumped from no knowledge, through reasonable knowledge to substantial. If you're going to have an argument mate you're going to have to pick one thing to argue. It's just amusing if you keep on changing your tune every 5 seconds

You know what I've been arguing, I've reminded you 8 times in this thread already. If you didn't want to get into that argument you shouldn't have, I never forced you. Your simple inability to counter my points means perhaps my points were right. After all you have no idea about PU's so why get into a debate about them
----------------------------------------------------------------------

suggest you go back and look at the start of our debate nsix to find out who said what and when they said it -

i have only said mclaren would have been feeding honda information about the merc PU ,
---------- it has been you adding bits on arguing all along that mclaren would not have a clue about the PU ,

what do you seriously expect me to say to somebody that thinks mclaren F1 -- repeat mclaren F1 would not have a fairly -- repeat fairly knowledgeable idea of the merc PU after having it inside there cars for over a year

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 2.33 from 3 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available