or to join or start a new Discussion

5 Comments
Article Rating 2.13 Stars

Should Chambers fee be spent elsewhere?

4* Yes
2* No

comment by 8bit (U2653)

posted on 27/7/14

we have more money anyway so it's a moot point. 3

comment by Ocelots (U3893)

posted on 27/7/14

Essentially depends whether it's going to stop Wenger strengthening elsewhere. Chambers is a great prospect and can cover some positions where we currently need backup, so if we can still go out and sign other players (in particular a DM) as well, there's no issue. If however we're buying Chambers at the expense of missing out on other players we need more, that's clearly pretty silly.

comment by (U7889)

posted on 27/7/14

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)

posted on 27/7/14

I don't get the feeling the Chambers deal affects any other potential transfers we would like to make, so I don't think it matters.

comment by (U7889)

posted on 27/7/14

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 2.13 from 8 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available