We were told it would be the most competitive league in Scotland.
It was to be where all the excitement was.
3 of Scotland's biggest clubs battling it out.
In fact if you believed the likes of Keevins and Jackson (and most bears did) you wouldn't look any further for your football fix.
It's all turned out a bit like the 'Armageddon' threat, it never materialised.
Hearts 9 points clear. Rangers a further 4 clear of QOS.
And of course when the runaway leaders came to the home of the champions they were dispatched with the minimum of fuss.
pffft!
The Scottish Championship
posted on 25/11/14
I am actually laughing at it, it's like the flooking Da Vinci code
posted on 25/11/14
comment by NNH, you were all wummed by the Rocket (U10730)
posted 57 seconds ago
So its ok to excuse the team being $hite coz Mowbray was in charge and picked it, but its not okay to say Ki was and is still a good player, Mowbray not picking him made him $hite did it??
Before I try and understand this point, do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said this
"Ki didn't start games for Celtic until Lennon took over. He was a bit part player under Mowbray."
How does that make Ki worse than all the midfielders you have now??
How does the fact a $hite manager like Mowbray decided not to pick him mean he's not a better player than Johansen??
and before you start talking about formations, you've picked Guidetti alone from your current strikers, yet either Stokes, Griffiths or Scepovic have been on the park with him at all times since he has been here.
posted on 25/11/14
"Ki didn't start games for Celtic until Lennon took over. He was a bit part player under Mowbray."
How does that make Ki worse than all the midfielders you have now??
Because he was only 19 or something back then, he wasn't good enough at the time.
Yes he is good enough now but we are talking about whether our team is better now or then not if that team were better players down the line.
yet either Stokes, Griffiths or Scepovic have been on the park with him at all times since he has been here.
I know that but I replaced them with two guys who would be better in the team now from the previous squad mentioned.
posted on 25/11/14
posted on 25/11/14
comment by Mick Dee - First there was the "Rumble in the Jungle", then the "Thrilla in Manila". Don't miss the next super-fight the "Xscape to Victory" Bhoy "Meal Deal" Murney v Ibrox "Bench Press" Elite 6/6/15 (U14135)
posted 1 minute ago
Ki became a better player after that date.
Who knows, maybe McGregor will become a better player after this date.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and Scepovic
posted on 25/11/14
Lysander
Hibs record during that time
3 wins
2 draws
7 defeats
That is a better record than Dundee United's
The point made is that Dundee United's record was not $hite, and that point stands
During that time, vs Celtic
Hibs amassed 11 points
Dundee United amassed 8 points
Hearts 7
Motherwell 5
Aberdeen 4
Its hardly a $hite or dire record for a team thats the underdog in each and every one of those games. To come away with points from 6 out of 12 games is not bad at all.
posted on 25/11/14
Celtics record against AC Milan in the Champions League
1 wins
2 draws
5 defeats
Aye, 1 win in 8 is fooking dire no matter how you dress it up
Whats that??
Bayern Munich have played AC Milan 6 times in the Champions League and never beaten them, they've only managed 2 draws......
Nah, Celtic's record is still utter $hite
posted on 25/11/14
Yes it is a shíte record.
Do you even know what point you are trying to make anymore?
posted on 25/11/14
Chu...that's nearly 30 minutes. I think we can assume that the answer is no
posted on 25/11/14
Magnum
1 win in 12 is a rotten record aye but what about 1 win in 8. eh...whit.