or to join or start a new Discussion

7 Comments
Article Rating 1 Star

Transfer Embargo

Going by what Stoopo wrote on Jontys post,

This has got to be the most stupid and laughable thing I've ever heard or seen in football.

The FL are suppose to look after and help the clubs in the league outside the PL, instead they're making things more difficult for certain clubs.

This wreaks of power grabbing to me, with intent to instill fear.

Do the multi million pound fines handed out to some clubs help those clubs, obviously not; does all the money actually go to charity?......makes you wonder.

posted on 15/12/14

Expected this, as has been mooted for some time, but the hits just keep on coming!

posted on 15/12/14

The FL cant afford to lose their star attraction, we are their crown jewel

comment by Sol (U2745)

posted on 15/12/14

Championship Financial Fair Play - Season 2013/14 Submissions
Posted: Mon 15 Dec 2014
Author: The Football League
The Football League
The Football League
Image by: File
An initial analysis of Financial Fair Play submissions from the current 24 Championship clubs has indicated that three clubs – Blackburn Rovers, Leeds United and Nottingham Forest – have failed to meet the Fair Play Requirement under the division’s Financial Fair Play rules. Consequently, all three will be subject to an ‘FFP embargo’ under Football League regulations from January 1, 2015 for the remainder of the current campaign.

The Football League is currently in discussions with a number of other clubs over their FFP submissions and will confirm any further FFP embargoes, if any, in due course. It will also now consider submissions from the three clubs promoted to the Premier League and the three clubs relegated to League 1 at the end of the 2013/14 season.

Blackburn, Leeds and Forest all exceeded the maximum permitted deviation of £8m - consisting of a maximum adjusted operating loss of £3m plus a further maximum of £5m of shareholder investment - during the 2013/14 playing season. Each club will have the opportunity to have its FFP embargo lifted at the end of the season by demonstrating that it has stayed within the maximum permitted deviation of £6m (£3m operating loss plus £3m shareholder investment) for the 2014/15 season.

The Football League has also confirmed the way in which FFP embargoes will operate for clubs placed under this sanction.

Clubs will be prohibited from registering any new professional players (permanent contract or loan) unless they have:

• 24 or fewer established players (players aged 21 or over that have made at least 5 starting appearances for the club).

Where clubs have fewer than 24 established players, they will only be permitted to sign players in the following circumstances (with the player in question being added to the club’s list of established players regardless of his age or previous playing experience):

• Where the employee costs of a player being signed are less than £600,000 per annum (or pro-rata if signed on a shorter contract).

Where clubs have 24 established players, they will be permitted to trade on a ‘one out, one in’ basis but only if the employee costs of the player coming in to the club are no more than whichever is the lower amount of:

• 75% of the equivalent costs of the player going out.
• Or a maximum of £600,000 per annum (or pro-rata if signed on shorter contract)

In addition:

• Clubs under an FFP embargo will be permitted to sign a goalkeeper on an emergency basis (in line with existing regulations).
• Clubs under an FFP embargo will not be permitted to pay transfer fees or compensation fees for professional players.
• Clubs under an FFP embargo will not be permitted to pay a loan fee to another club, they may only pay the player’s wage (or a contribution towards it).
• For incoming players, clubs can only pay Agents’ Fees as a benefit in kind to the player in question (as long as they do not exceed the £600,000 employee costs limit).

Read more at http://www.football-league.co.uk/news/article/2014/championship-financial-fair-play-season-201314-submissions-2144136.aspx#itZF3LjzZASVyBb3.99

comment by Sol (U2745)

posted on 15/12/14

Seems reasonable to me, on the face of it.

posted on 15/12/14

Those restrictions may be a blessing in disguise.

Thanks for posting the detailed implications Sol .

posted on 15/12/14

Cheers Sol, good post. So, any player under 21 does not count, and any player 21 or over that has not started 5 times is excluded from the number.

But anyone we bring in, we can't pay a transfer fee or a loan, and any wages must be on the basis that the annual pro rata cost does not exceed £600k, including any agent fees.

So how many players do we have:

Goalkeepers 1 - Silvestri (Taylor and Cairns both excluded)

Defenders 7 - Berardi, Bellusci, Byram, Cooper, Pearce, Warnock, Wootton

Midfielders 7 - Austin, Bianchi, Murphy, Norris, Thompson, Tonge, White

Strikers 4 - Antenucci, Doukara, Sharp, Morison

Question mark over Byram. Born in September 1993. He is 21 now, but was not 20 at start of season. I added him as the details did not include a date for age 21, so assume as of now.


That makes 19 players. Can't be bothered to try and see if Casper Sloth has started 5 matches, am assuming not, someone else can look. But that would only make 20. By my reckoning.

posted on 15/12/14

Sorry, 20 with Byram, 21 with Sloth

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available