Walcott and Sterling swap

What's a Garbutt ?

Then again how would you spot a world class player......you don't see (m)any at Anfield

comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 9 minutes ago
What's a Garbutt ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Genuine rofl moment. Can only just reach my keyboard from down here.

comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 18 minutes ago
Then again how would you spot a world class player......you don't see (m)any at Anfield
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you mean we don't see many at Anfield? Every time Everton come to play we are treated to the world class talent they have to offer

so now you are saying Everton have world class players?

But you all laughed at yeah yeah when he said it

I'd be happy with Walcott and 30m for Sterling. Ibe is coming through anyway, so Walcott could play more central for us with Sturridge. Whether we would spend the money wisely is a different question

For the record, Id rather keep a fit Walcott but if he cant end his injuries would take Sterling, but only as a squad player.

I think the praise and media have gone to Sterlings head. There are so many aspects of his game that need to improve. He does have all of the ingredients to become a top player, but at the moment, his passing, final decision, dribbling, and finishing all needs to improve.

he has pace, and lots of it, which is carrying him through right now. Take that away,and he'd be in the reserves.

Ibe - Lacks the same electrifying pace as Sterling, but is very quick (there is a huge difference, and currently its what sets Sterling apart form alot of players), but he seems more composed on the ball.

30 Miliion plus Sterling ..we'll, only if we had a player, in the last year of his contract gunning for the move. Walcotts Injury problems have to be taken into considerations.

As for 180k - Sterling is not worth that. Have a look at the players on that type of wage (on average, there a few that shouldn't be)

There's no way Sterling is worth £180k a week on our salary base, but he is clearly better than Walcott.

Sterling is never worth £260k a week.