or to join or start a new Discussion

Browse: Cricket  International  India 
22 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

Who is the best under 30 batsman?

We have had so many young batsmen coming through in international cricket who are playing cricket for a fair period of time.

from the players I can think of, of top of my mind, who would you guys rate your as your favourate batsman that is suitable to play in all formats and conditions?


The list is from
Kohli, Joe Root, Williamson, Angelo Mathews, Steve smith, Dave warner.

Add any other player you think might fit this category.


posted on 26/5/15

Smith averaged 38 last time out in England and scored a century, I think most would agree he has improved since then.

I'd say he has already got a run or two in England, how did Joe Root get on in Australia? Root is obviously a very fine player and he may well end up with more runs.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)

posted on 27/5/15

Kohli couldn't manage English conditions. England bowled very straight at him and he struggled..
----------
It was his first time in england if i remember correctly, sometimes players just need to get used to the english conditions which are very difficult for newbies.

Hes done very well in India, Australia, NZ and South Africa so we can cut him some slack.

Anyway Root looked like a lost puppie in Australia what was his excuse then?

Only reason why Root might score more runs is the shere amount of test cricket england play.

posted on 27/5/15

hahaha you go on about it was Kohli first tour of England and use that as an excuse and forget it was Roots first tour of Australia..
Kohli was useless in England because his technique was found wanting..
Last time around in Australia the wickets were unbelievable flat.
India scored 450/500 and still lost games.. It was more the facts the pitches were flat that Kohli scored runs.
When Root played the year before.. The pitches had more pace. England couldn't cope with the trajectory and bounce of Johnson..

posted on 27/5/15

England batsmen like Cook/Root and Bell.. will never get the credit they deserve.. If they aint from some fair off paradise and play beach cricket.. They come from England so they cant be any good. Its England after all.
Cook will end up with 1300/14000 runs. Root will probably get 10-000 runs and Bell 9000 runs if he carries on etc.
But they are English so they are useless. Not like world beating Kohli hes indian and wow some of his innings are world class.
Bell and root have had some great innings for England. But nope they are English.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)

posted on 27/5/15

Think your going abit overboard there EnglandWhoelse.

posted on 27/5/15

You also have to understand batting in england is (on the whole) the hardest place to bat in the world

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)

posted on 28/5/15

Well not if your from England.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)

posted on 28/5/15

My Top 3 would be -

1 - Kohli
2 - Root
3 - Williamson

I look at Steve Smith and im thinking hows he making these runs, his technique imo is very flawed but we will see in the ashes as this will be his 2nd time over here so no excuses.

posted on 28/5/15

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
My Top 3 would be -

1 - Kohli
2 - Root
3 - Williamson

I look at Steve Smith and im thinking hows he making these runs, his technique imo is very flawed but we will see in the ashes as this will be his 2nd time over here so no excuses.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Duncan said when Smith was last in England he averaged 38 and 4 years on he is much better. It is hard to look beyond Smith.

comment by Bestie (U1113)

posted on 28/5/15

Agree that Smith is one of those who looks nothing special but is an absolute beast in terms of his stats. For me, it comes down to what format you place most of your merit on - I'd agree that Smith is the most rounded of the lot across all formats, but Williamson has the form card at present in tests and Root has the best average and is the most fun to watch. Don't rate Kohli all that highly in tests - obviously still good, but I think he's slightly below the other three. Mathews I haven't seen enough of, but he impressed me when SL toured England and has made some consistently good scores.

Ultimately, you could make a case for any of Root, Smith and Williamson being the best in tests and it would be both tricky to argue for and against. As for Root not doing well down under - that was before his sudden improvement; he was still potential then, but has carried the team since.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available