or to join or start a new Discussion

20 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

well well well

hi reds
just seen this

http://www.thisisanfield.com/2015/05/liverpool-have-bid-for-southamptons-nathaniel-clyne-rejected/

personally im a little torn on this, I think hes excellent rb and good on the offense, but I keep thinking "not another Southampton player!!"

thoughts peeps?

posted on 29/5/15

comment by (Kash) Mario Balle Balle Balotelli - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 4 minutes ago
We just needed to offer Lovren to go the other way plus £9.5m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't that still just a 10mil bid though?

posted on 29/5/15

comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by (Kash) Mario Balle Balle Balotelli - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 4 minutes ago
We just needed to offer Lovren to go the other way plus £9.5m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't that still just a 10mil bid though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no, that would be offering £10.5m plus lovren.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 29/5/15

£10 million?

This is a joke, right?

posted on 29/5/15

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 29/5/15

comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 6 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by kennys RESPECTED fluffy fringe- the fringe MUST be respected!! (U1822)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 6 minutes ago
If you really have bid £10m then, whilst I get the whole bid low to start with theory, that does seem to be slightly taking the p....s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what wud u consider respectable?
plus our owners are forever undervaluing really good players, getting priced out of it then we overpay for our 2nd choice!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if you think you could get him for, let's say £16-18m, i'd have thought an opening offer has to be at least £12m...otherwise you run the risk of annoying the selling club.

given that last year they sold shaw for £27m, chambers for £16m, and, erm, lovren for £20m, i think we can guess what their response to a £10m bid for clyne would be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But surely the fact we are in the Southampton Frequent Buyer Scheme means we're entitled to some discount? We've accumulated some serious points, you know......

posted on 29/5/15

Price is about right for a defender with a year left on his contract.

If we go more than £15m we are absolutely mental, though I do rate Clyne.

posted on 29/5/15

its just a wind up... b-rod knows we poor reds have been wound up by nasty Southampton internet warriors so he is getting his own back.

posted on 29/5/15

If there was a Southampton player to purchase last summer by us he was the one. I said at time we should have got him especially after the footers we're going on about how great chambers was

posted on 29/5/15

We'll bid £15mil
Then Spurs will bid £17mil
Then he'll sign for Chelsea for £14mil

posted on 29/5/15

Kaiser....its like your psychic

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available