Is our most dangerous player consistently dropped?
Antenucci has to start. Bottom line.
Turnbull, Berrardi, Bamba , Cooper , Taylor, Botaka, Cook, Murphy, Dallas, Wood, Antenucci.
I can accept us losing games. But setting a team up defencively with a back four that can't defend is laughable, and frankly, awful management.
4-4-2, let's have a go at teams, we actually have the odd dangerous player now.
Why oh why..
posted on 4/10/15
posted on 4/10/15
I think wood and ant upfront could work.
However lets be honest here, we are saying this because ant and wood are our only two strikers as things stand.
Personally I think ant/Morrison would have worked much better than ant/wood would.
Morrison does far more than wood, I wood/ant partnership has ant doing all the work to get wood into the game.
Morrison would get ant into the game more than wood will.
I'd like to see us start with Buckley and botaka on the wings and play adeyemi and cook in the middle. I think buck/bot is a more attack minded midfield than with dallas who is quite defensive with his style of play.
posted on 5/10/15
When Buckley is match fit I'd give him a shot in the middle playing more advanced with Adeyemi or Cook playing the defensive/holding role.
I know he's technically a winger but with Botaka, Adeyemi, Buckley, Dallas as a mid 4 we might pose more of a threat going forward.
Time to rest Murphy and Mowatt.
posted on 5/10/15
Buckley in the middle? Have you been drinking Perth?
posted on 5/10/15
gelderd
posted on 5/10/15
I don't know where people get these ideas from
Buckley been a winger all his career, never in a month of Sunday's looks like central would suit him.
Yet because he's had a garbage game people think let play him in the centre
It's the same people saying lets play bellusci in midfield.
It's madness
posted on 5/10/15
"It's the same people saying lets play bellusci in midfield."
That idea is so last season, now we want as many strikers/wingers in the team as possible!
posted on 5/10/15
We currently have nobody who plays the position of forward midfield and as I said previously, I know he's a winger but it's more feasible than getting Murphy, cook, Mowatt to do a job there.
posted on 5/10/15
Perth
Why sign a winger to then play in a completely alien position.
When not sign, an attacking midfielder !!!!
And there is no way he'd be any better than cook or mowatt in that position.
Or why not play 442 !!!!
posted on 5/10/15
I'd be over the moon if we signed an attacking midfielder but we haven't and part of that reason is we already have a lot of midfielders.
I'd rather have signed an attacking midfielder than Buckley.
I'd also be happy playing 442.
Maybe our tactics just aren't bringing the best out of the players we have.