From O'Rourke
"More tidying up of the accounts yesterday at #LUFC. Enterprise Insurance and one other debt paid off (or officially satisfied, anyway)."
Only one debt outstanding now according to him - GFH.
TOMA
posted on 21/9/16
Can someone tell me what TOMA stands for. ATM I have worked out as. Take Over Monday Afternoon
posted on 21/9/16
Take Over My Arseeeee
posted on 21/9/16
comment by LIW - Monk a dead man walking (U8453)
posted 2 hours, 59 minutes ago
Monday but there's no point in posting what I find out on here
---------/----
Hang in isn't that excatly what you've done
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No - this is common knowledge for those on Twitter.
I was just sharing for those who don't use it as it seems to be the first place things are aired in public.
posted on 21/9/16
Of course it was common knowledge on Twitter - rumours on Twitter are your 'source', no?
posted on 21/9/16
tells me that whoever it is, is serious about the club, doesn't appear to be a shyster, is obviously looking to the future, especially if they've cleared the haigh debt & berrydale is it ?.......wouldn't surprise me if ER is already purchased, whoever it is aint fooking about......thats a good thing...
posted on 21/9/16
oh and i don't think o'rourke is a bulls*itter.....he has some good info.
posted on 21/9/16
Agree harj. This looks well serious and massively promising. Worst case, club or someone is clearing
the club's debts/rid us of GFH at boardroom level.
Please Football Gods, let their be minted light at the end of this bloody tunnel.
posted on 21/9/16
comment by LeedsRich - Sell up now and Fook off home! (U18097)
posted 4 hours, 37 minutes ago
Take Over My Arseeeee
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I got half of it right then
posted on 21/9/16
LIW, keep your comments to the football and the players mate!
posted on 21/9/16
comment by ShaunLeeds (U21088)
posted 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
Of course it was common knowledge on Twitter - rumours on Twitter are your 'source', no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A big fat NO!