or to join or start a new Discussion

8 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

kunted after a shift

wined's downs to a wee cold beverage and do the usual read online for latest updates on Rangers.

Mike feching Ashley and his wise guy associate Derek la bamba what ever his fecking name is are covering media headlines again.

I am utterly sick of this continued shoitte.

Aye Ashley has more dough than King and that's not disputable but best intentions are.

It's hoped that a tidal wave of support will sway in support of Ashley and i hope my fellow bears don't follow for these tactics.

I was a staunch critic of King, Murray and Co when they had a chance to buy, before green came up with a measly £5.5M to buy the lot.

But now i would not change King for Ashley as he screwed us when he had control and make no doubt he'll doubly screw us over given the chance again.

All i ask for as a guy that loves his football team and watch it shattered after years of nightmarish activity is some stability and that won't come after all the Old Co cases are filed away and previous directors and CEO's have investigations finished etc

There's a couple of good Celtic men on here that do recognize that the league needs a strong Rangers on and off the field and then theirs those that cherish it's current affairs and situation the club finds itself in, and i get that and recognise your love for the club you support and the hatred to all things Rangers also.

This bear presently is not happy with its current direction and that's got nothing to do with how we measure up against Celtic at the moment either.

I'd personally hope that by making Rangers an attraction they'd strike up a dominating deal similar to Sports Direct but with a Red Bull or what ever but in return Rangers can get a sum that would help them move on and strips being sold. It has to be market value and if possible above not like what Ashley has at present.

I think King and Co are the right men in the short to long term and must fight still in the courtroom to make any deals done with that lot null and void.

whats your thoughts bears?

posted on 5/3/17

I think you should have another beer then a wee lie down in a dark room Fat Ashley will not get anywhere near Ibrox.

posted on 5/3/17

i think to rule out such idea would be foolish and if King can negotiate a better Kit deal it may well happen.

you may be right that he might not get his grip on the club again but i would not rule such idea out.

posted on 5/3/17

Mon Fat Mike. He's looking fo a cheap location in a deprived area for his new distribution centre and Ibrox fits the bill. Demolish and stick two reasonable sized warehouses on the site. St Anthony's will rent their ground out to you guys.👍

posted on 5/3/17

Ashley is not daft..he's waiting to pounce when the soft loans dry up. Very very clever man.

posted on 5/3/17

Soft loans are that - interest free.

that's not entirely bad however due to clubs financial income we have no other option.

why is this a criticism?

King didn't sign the deal with SD nor did he say he would gift away his entire personal fortune to Rangers.

posted on 5/3/17

The SD deal is as much of a hinderance to rangers growth as is the tier 1 tax case that stopped the sale of Rangers over the years imo.

posted on 6/3/17

As long as Ashley cannot get his hands on rangers again, I will be happy. He is a disgrace and offers nothing positive for rangers.

If king can negotiate a better kit deal with SD, then so be it, that's business and as long as it's a fair contract this time with rangers getting majority of the proceeds of a kit sale then fine.

However I don't want to see Ashley increase his share ownership or have any control or loans to rangers again.

I am happy with king and the current directors for the short term. It's been a difficult first season back in the top flight, let's see how things looks at start of next season with a new manager on board and what funds he has been given.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 6/3/17

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available