or to join or start a new Discussion

8 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Monday Gossip

by Caroline Oatway
@Roline_MCFC

Entertaining, high-tempo, frantic, thrilling… There are plenty of positive adjectives to describe Man City’s 1-1 draw with Liverpool in Monday morning’s headlines.

An absorbing affair, packed with action and incident, ensured media outlets of the footballing world have plenty to discuss in the aftermath.

Without further ado, let’s dive in…

The Telegraph’s Jason Burt reflected: “Bonkers. Utterly and gloriously bonkers.

“And that was just the two manic managers on the touchline.

“Little wonder Pep Guardiola and Jürgen Klopp collapsed into each other’s arms at the final whistle. This was as relentless, dramatic, astonishing and compelling as it comes. And somehow it ended just 1-1.

“Right result. Wrong scoreline. Four-four would have been a better reflection of what unfolded.

“It was an encounter of such breathless, topsy-turvy commitment – full of thrills and spills. It was certainly not boring.

“Neither team felt like they could afford to lose but both, to their credit, simply went for it and tried to win.

“The quality of the defending, the exceptional John Stones apart, was questionable, but when teams attack with such endeavour there is sometimes a price to pay.

“If only, as Guardiola lamented, and Klopp could have concurred, they had taken their chances."

The Guardian’s Daniel Taylor echoed: “By the end, it was difficult to recall the last time a 1-1 draw had provided so much incident and drama.

“Between them, Manchester City and Liverpool kept up a long narrative of breathless, energetic football. A two-goal thriller that had just about everything: controversy, penalties, non‑penalties, near-unremitting attacking and, from Adam Lallana, a miss that might wake him in a cold sweat. Everything, in fact, apart from a winner.

“Perhaps it was fair that the game finished as a draw. Both sides had given everything. They could both reflect on chances to win, and they could both have lost. It was a tremendous battle, full of everything that is good about the Premier League, featuring two sides playing with a shared sense of adventure.

“To dwell too much on the various penalty appeals would perhaps be unfair when the game was such a rich spectacle, not only because of the speed and skill of the players but also the spirit in which both teams faced one another down."

Wrote Phil McNulty for BBC Sport: “A hugely entertaining game was littered with talking points, astonishing misses and a sense of injustice for both sides as they felt they were on the receiving end of debatable decisions from referee Michael Oliver.

“The scoreline only scratches at the surface of a game that was enthralling from start to finish, illustrating the strengths and weaknesses of both sides, who possess verve in attack but frailty in defence.


“City and Liverpool both created and missed the sort of chances that could have turned one point into three and made life a little easier in the closing stages of the season."

Agreed the Express’ Gideon Brooks: “There was a ‘spider camera’ for the first time at the Etihad Stadium and it captured a mid-air view of a cracker with the pace being helped by a saturated surface.

“The end-to-end effort and commitment came as no surprise because the stats show these two teams have run the furthest distances this season – Liverpool have racked up 117.3km per game, while Manchester City are not far behind on the hard yards at 114.8km.

“But the big shock, considering the amount of chances created, was that there were only two goals.

“The result wasn’t one that either Pep Guardiola or Jurgen Klopp wanted but such was the end-to-end nature of breathless fixture it was difficult to separate them."

Ian Ladyman of the Daily Mail scribed: “Manchester City and Liverpool were brilliant to watch here and this was a brilliant game. But their watchability comes not just from their exciting attacking play but also from their flaws and unpredictability.

“Maybe that all sounds a little unfair after such a terrific game. Whatever we may think about Pep Guardiola and Jurgen Klopp, both managers are admirably committed to aggressive, front-foot football.

“Both managers will have gone home on Sunday knowing that they could have won but were also rather fortunate not to lose."

The Metro’s Simon Rice stated: “It might not have been the goal fest many predicted but Man City v Liverpool didn’t disappoint.

“The game was littered with chances, frenetic play, moments of brilliance and controversial incidents before it ultimately ended up all square at 1-1 through goals from James Milner and Sergio Aguero."

posted on 20/3/17

My favourite moment wasn't the game itself it was Guardiola's ' I know, right?!' when Liverpool didn't get a decision as if to acknowledge that both were on the end of wrong decisions.

posted on 20/3/17

On reflection, the draw was the fair result. The referee was poor but both sides can call the ref out on that.

Thought Toure was going to get his marching orders after that 'challenge' on Can, in the first half. Credit to Can. He didn't make anything of it all.

How the referee doesn't give City a penalty for Milner's foul on Sterling is laughable. There was no excuse. He was right there and must have seen that Milner made no contact with the ball.

There were other incidents that both sets of supporters can point to but how long would this post be if I tried to mention them all???

My frustration centres mainly on missed opportunities by City in the first half hour. Nothing new there.

The story of City's season has been profligacy in front of goal and it has cost the club the chance of mounting a real title challenge.

posted on 20/3/17

Indeed. The penalty on Mane could have went either way. Otamendi was very clever in the he didn't challenge but made sure Mane connected with his leg. Toure pulled a Liverpool player to the ground in the box and of course should have been off. Milner should have been off for the foul on Sterling and I think in the lead up to that it was Matip who pulled a City player to the ground. There could have been a few red cards and penalties but of course Liverpool fans will point to the fact that theirs happened first and would have changed the whole game. Whether that would have been for the better or not we don't know but if history is anything to go by, the chances are that it would have been.

Oliver went into the game determined to let it flow but for me that can be just as bad as ruining games with red cards and penalties. You have to judge each decision on its own merit, you can't decide how you're gonna referee the game beforehand. Apparently Oliver was tired and this was the reason. I don't believe that for a second. I simply think he wanted to let the game flow as you say.

posted on 20/3/17

I really don't think Oliver should have been refereeing that and in the first place given the errors he made in the United Chelsea game.

I do think it was a rare game in that missed sitters and decisions were pretty equal for both teams and although there should have been red cards shown for both, I really don't mind the fact that it stayed 11 vs 11 (I think people look for red cards far too often nowadays in general, but that's a different matter).

It wasn't a malicious game by any stretch, more breathless and full credit to both teams. The only downside was I got absolutely drenched in the first half!

comment by MBL. (U6305)

posted on 20/3/17

The neutrals seem to have enjoyed the game and the football was entertaining.

Isn't that what it's all about.

posted on 20/3/17

That's the third game we've had a terrible ref against one of the 'top clubs' - Chelsea, Spurs and Liverpool.

I'm sure my heart will sink as soon as the ref for the Derby is announced as there's very few that aren't on my Black List at the moment.

comment by LEE1PEN (U6707)

posted on 20/3/17

Boris it could be worse at least it's not Wayne Barnes.

posted on 20/3/17

They'll probably draft him in.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available