or to join or start a new Discussion

91 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Financial Review

RANGERS International Football Club PLC unaudited trading results for the six months to 31 December 2016.

The results for the six month period have mainly been driven by the Club’s return to the SPFL Premiership. Overall it is an encouraging financial performance that reflects the move to a more normalized trading environment as the numerous event risks that have bedeviled the Club’s operations over the last few years have been brought under control.

Resolution of the ongoing dispute with Sports Direct is the only significant issue that still adversely affects the trading performance. Executive management is increasingly able to focus its attention on the Club’s core footballing activities.

Revenue for the period was £16.3m, an overall increase of £5.3m over the comparative period.This was a result of three main factors:-

enhanced attendance; increasing ticketing and hospitality revenue by £3.4m;
the return to the SPFL Premiership this season; generating a £0.8m increase in the central funds received by the Club;
a much improved performance in sponsorship and commercial revenues; aided by being back in the top league.

Operating expenses, excluding amortisation of players’ registrations, increased by £4.1m compared to the comparative period. This increase is driven by three main factors:-

a substantial increase in the player pool costs, to allow the team to be competitive in the Premiership;
an increase in matchday costs, such as policing and stewarding, reflecting the higher profile of this season’s matches;
an increase to overheads in the business as the Board continues to re-establish best practices throughout the Club.

The net impact of these factors is that the operating result improved, from a loss of £0.5m in the comparative period, to a profit of £0.3m. The Club is well on its way to achieving a sustainable business model while continuing to invest in infrastructure and the player squad.

Reliance is still placed on shareholders to fund the shortfall that is required during the current rebuilding phase.

Whilst additional funds are available if required by the Club, no further funding from investors is anticipated in the balance of this financial year to June 2017 due to the team’s football performance and progression to the William Hill Scottish Cup semi-finals.

https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/financial-review-2/

posted on 23/3/17

comment by Sevpov-show me ra deeds (U10636)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by rats juice anurr cockjugglingthundercunt (U6393)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
comment by Sevpov-show me ra deeds (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by rats juice anurr cockjugglingthundercunt (U6393)
posted 5 minutes ago
Kerrydale accountants in "Rangers urr fcked" shocker

Thanks guys. Thanks for caring
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't think anyone has said that...


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does that really count?

I mean, really??


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Nah not really.

posted on 23/3/17

I'm still not sure why anyone isn't reading that the accounts state a loss for the period. 🤔

And on the back of these amazing results the share price has









dropped over 4%.

Look. I'm just trying to help ok 😁

posted on 23/3/17

They decreased their losses by £50k-ats em onna road tae a compfy level of finanshul stabilllitae!

posted on 23/3/17

Pur jealous man

posted on 23/3/17

McCann

posted on 23/3/17

comment by McCannStoleMaCookie (U20688)
posted 37 minutes ago
Pur jealous man
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pur?!?

Pfft!

Pyoor!!

Flange.

posted on 23/3/17

Pyoor Flange?

Mmmmmm

posted on 23/3/17

As opposed to what 'Brenda' likes, which is false flange.

posted on 23/3/17

False flange eh?

I could be tempted.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available