or to join or start a new Discussion

103 Comments
Article Rating 2.14 Stars

So it wasn't the players then

according to CR. they did not get him sacked it was someone within the club who wanted him out.
Like in the falling out of any partnership the kids may feel they have to take sides or disturbed enough not to perform at school.
who was this man CR had a small problem last season and when things went bad took his opportunity.
CR being a man spoke face to face to that person and blabbing about who it is.

I'm expecting the standard responses and yes it's history but relevant if that person is still at our club and did not work with the most successful manager but orchestrated his removal.

That would explain the players performing so much better when the divorce was finalized not having the two key men in their working lives not talking to each other and getting one of them fired.

posted on 12/4/17

CoE - stop arguing with children, it really doesn't become you.

posted on 12/4/17

comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 7 hours, 55 minutes ago
And our players did give up on Mourinho. Some did. Just like most or all of your players gave up on Ranieri. It's so clear for everyone to see apart from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CoE is spot on so I'm agreeing with him. You're the one who's clueless about this topic, clearly in complete WUM mode and unfortunately CoE is taking the bait.

posted on 12/4/17

Now you two have finished and BS can't comment on this as he has filtered me thank God.

Interesting comment from Alan Brazil he said he heard from a player (unnamed of course)That the players had stop listening to CR and did not think he knew what he was doing.

That would lead you to believe that they would turn to someone the did believe.

So despite your protestations in our case as with Chelsea the players got the manager sacked and in our case because they did not want to do what he wanted them to do. Now the assistant manager could of said don't be silly boys lets work this through with CR or not who knows but it explains a lot.

I have an idea know whos taken it to the board but it not anyone who has been mentioned.

posted on 12/4/17

Nev

posted on 12/4/17

Alan Brazil who listens to this piiissed up idiot?

posted on 12/4/17

Well I heard that CR did the team talk before the Man City game and, just before kick off, the players all decided to ignore what they had been told and play their own game. The result? 4-2 and us playing exciting, attacking goal scoring football.

Give me a choice of that or the players acting on CR's instructions and losing that game 3 or 4 nil, I'll take the players deciding their own playing style.

posted on 12/4/17

If that was the case why did they loose so many games or did they pick which matches to listen to cr and which ones to ignore him

posted on 12/4/17

A lot of people have stopped listening to Alan Brazil for much the same reason.

posted on 12/4/17

Oh, and apparently this is from Ranieri's mouth about Shakespeare, the day after the Sky Sports MNF interview:

“He always behaved in a loyal manner with me. He was a good assistant.”


Which would appear to put Rudkin as prime suspect for his comments, although as I've said before I don't see the motive and it could still be merely a matter of false perception.

posted on 12/4/17

comment by The_Dungeon_Master (U4830)
posted 37 minutes ago
A lot of people have stopped listening to Alan Brazil for much the same reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless of course with his close links to Leicester's Players his claims suit your propaganda.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 2.14 from 7 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available