Which striker? Vote now!

I'd keep Zlatan on, see how Rashers (and Martial) respond in those first few months.

Using one game to downplay Rashford's "readiness" seems a bit misleading... He got dreadful service all night... passes were going all over the place and the few he did manage to salvage were way out wide.

Let's also talk about the chelsea game when looking at whether he is too green

Wasn't there an article comparing Rashford with Kane on here the other day with a lot of United fans favouring Rashford? If he's that good, why not try developing him to be your striker?

comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 1 minute ago
Wasn't there an article comparing Rashford with Kane on here the other day with a lot of United fans favouring Rashford? If he's that good, why not try developing him to be your striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I basically said that we are only talking about Kane now because they put trust in a youngster... Why shouldn't we do the same?

I reckon Rashy, played all season, would get 15-20 goals, with more goals coming from martial, mkhi, griezz (if signed) due to the different style of play

None of the above for me to be honest.

Would rather we went after someone like Gameiro at Atletico

comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - 2017 joy squids (U2958)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 1 minute ago
Wasn't there an article comparing Rashford with Kane on here the other day with a lot of United fans favouring Rashford? If he's that good, why not try developing him to be your striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I basically said that we are only talking about Kane now because they put trust in a youngster... Why shouldn't we do the same?

I reckon Rashy, played all season, would get 15-20 goals, with more goals coming from martial, mkhi, griezz (if signed) due to the different style of play
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With an improvement in finishing, which will come in time, he will get those sorts of figures for you, or better.

No way would a lad like timo Werner move to sit behind Greizmann and possibly behind rashford given he's similar in terms of a young lad needing games to continue to develop.

The others mentioned would at least have the confidence that they could really challenge Greizmann.

Klippity is keen on Werner anyway, whilst united have shown no interest. If he moves to the prem it would be to us, I don't expect him to move anyway though.

I wouldn't get out yer prams over signing Griezmann just yet!

comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 2 hours, 42 minutes ago
I wouldn't get out yer prams over signing Griezmann just yet!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dunno if he could handle our league anyway, seems like he's get injured easily here in jolly 'ol.

comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 8 hours, 32 minutes ago
None of the above for me to be honest.

Would rather we went after someone like Gameiro at Atletico
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not Lacazette who is younger and better?

How do I vote for 'any of the first three and not Griezmann please'?