If Everton sign Sandro for 5ยท2 million ,and we sign Lukaku for even 50 or 60 million,
who will be the winners ??????????,not Chelsea methinks.
Sandro a snap.
posted on 22/6/17
I missed the point then Kunte ! ...........but I still would say that Everton have got the better deal.
posted on 22/6/17
Chelsea will be stung much more than 50m for Lukaku.
70m+
posted on 22/6/17
Sorry I didn't know he's aigning for that price, twitter was saying just days ago he was a €30m signing. Yeah Everton doing well financially, they're still losing their best striker since Rooney and replacing him with a 5"9 striker/winger who's only scored 14 goals in his first breakthrough season
posted on 22/6/17
Yes ,playing in a Malaga team that was struggling to stay out of the bottom half all season.
Their's nothing wrong with being 5"9, check out some of the best players ever ,Messi,Neymar,Suarez to name just three,who were keeping him out of the Barca team,the previous season.
posted on 22/6/17
I would be amazed if we got Lukaku for £50m, the way the market is looking at the moment with wing backs being quoted between £45/55M.
Everton will do very well out of the deal and god luck to them, serves us right for not putting in a buy back clause.
posted on 22/6/17
Everton will do very well out of the deal and god luck to them, serves us right for not putting in a buy back clause.
-------------------------------------------------
Agreed. Rookie error.
posted on 22/6/17
We'll probab sign Lukaku for £50M plus like £20M if we win the league within 2 years or he wins the golden boot.
posted on 22/6/17
More chance of 70m + 20m if you win the league.
posted on 22/6/17
Whatever we pay for Lukaku ,.....we missed a trick with Sandro ,Everton have done a good deal.
posted on 23/6/17
Sandra is not that good.We should have tried to get Alves but signing Bonucci would also be an excellent signing for Chelsea.