VVD Alternatives

comment by If anyone can, Emre Can... (U3979)
posted 9 hours, 27 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
What was the mess up from the owners?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tapping up the client - admittedly this probably isn't the owners.

Just don't do it! I'd be livid if it was done to Coutinho so why should our club do it? Just go through the proper channels.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was announced earlier that we would have been cleared of any wrongdoing as we didn't do anything wrong. There was insufficient evidence against us.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

A report in The Times says Liverpool will not face any punishment over the alleged tapping up of Southampton defender Virgil van Dijk after a preliminary investigation from the Premier League found there was insufficient evidence to start disciplinary proceedings.

That was posted on BBC sportsday page this morning.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Yes. But they put all evidence forward. PL said not sufficient enough so unless we do something silly, dare I say we got away with it?

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

IF Van Dijk moves in this window...I will honestly be astounded if it wasn't to us.

I'm reaching the stage where I don't care any more. Is there any benefit in VvD waiting till the opening day of the shooting (i.e. Transfer window) season on 1st July to make any move, such as submitting a written transfer?

JimmyTheRed

According to the Evening Standard, Chelsea are now concentrating their CB efforts on VVD.

http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/virgil-van-dijk-transfer-news-chelsea-focus-on-southampton-man-after-juventus-close-the-door-on-a3573981.html

He's already refused Chelsea.

If Saints accept their bid, it opens the door for us again.