Morata

He was Chelsea's first choice too, 100%, yep, nobody else they'd rather have, not a single forward. Have to question their scouting

comment by Lurker (U21432)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Returning managers (U1762)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'The Special One' - Lukaku 🖒 (U18599)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 59 minutes ago
The Chelsea fans are just excited they finally caught up with Sunderlands top flight title haul.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And sunderland did it without a sugar daddy too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Four dodgy buisnessmen saved United from going extinct as Newton Heath, said dodgy buisnessmen changed the clubs name to Manchester United
----------------------------------------------------------------------

theres clutching at straws, and then there is this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Truth hurt?

Just because it was over 100 year's ago doesn't mean it didn't happen

comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-bye bye costa (U9257)
posted 10 minutes ago
Of course you are! Now that is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah because his careers been littered with goals this far.

What's funny is the fact you bought a sub striker to replace one of the perms best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you replaced one of the prem's best with a glorified Demba Ba

Here's Brummies comment the other week Lurker, Eric disappeared after being confronted with such a home truth and no doubt you will now

comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 1 week ago
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
If only we had an a sheikh or a Russian gangster propping us up.

No thanks.....you lot can keep your el plastico tag. You're nothing without your owners. The truth hurts.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In January 1902, with debts of £2,670 equivalent to £260,000 in 2017[nb 1] the club was served with a winding-up order.[16] Captain Harry Stafford found four local businessmen, including John Henry Davies (who became club president), each willing to invest £500 in return for a direct interest in running the club and who subsequently changed the name;[17]



So Yoonited were the product of the rich of the time - who'd have thought they were such a bunch of plastic kunts!

I wonder what the real clubs of the time thought about these moneybags clubs ruining the game!

So they invested the equivalent of just under £10,000 in today's climate.

Hmm I just can't tell the difference 🤔

comment by Returning managers (U1762)
posted 8 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-bye bye costa (U9257)
posted 10 minutes ago
Of course you are! Now that is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah because his careers been littered with goals this far.

What's funny is the fact you bought a sub striker to replace one of the perms best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you replaced one of the prem's best with a glorified Demba Ba
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He is one of the most prolific strikers in the PL

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 10 minutes ago
So they invested the equivalent of just under £10,000 in today's climate.

Hmm I just can't tell the difference 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------

50k weren't it?

Point still stands though

comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 10 minutes ago
So they invested the equivalent of just under £10,000 in today's climate.

Hmm I just can't tell the difference 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------

50k weren't it?

Point still stands though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍 Too early on a Monday for the internal calculator to be functioning correctly.

Point very much still stands.

He didn't to be fair, he invested far more than that. Also, football inflation is different to normal inflation, you would need to compare it to turnover at the time.

The better argument is you have the weight of history behind it now. At the same time, there comes a point where the same must be said of others as well.

comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 5 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Returning managers (U1762)
posted 8 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickalopodis-bye bye costa (U9257)
posted 10 minutes ago
Of course you are! Now that is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah because his careers been littered with goals this far.

What's funny is the fact you bought a sub striker to replace one of the perms best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you replaced one of the prem's best with a glorified Demba Ba
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He is one of the most prolific strikers in the PL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually the comparison was a bit harsh. Ba actually did it in the big games.