Should've had 3 penalties and a perfectly good goal by Lacazette ruled out.
We had other chances too, but unfortunately they just all fell to Danny facking Welbeck.
One thing I was not impressed with was our play from about 75 minutes onwards, and our substitutions. Bringing on Walcott and taking off Lacazette against a team parking the bus at the time? Taking off your only ball playing midfielder in Xhaka with so many forwards on the pitch?
I'm not sure if we took off Welbeck or not but the guy is just facking horrid in front of goal.
Browse:
We played quite well I reckon
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 20/8/17
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted on 20/8/17
it wasn't funny the 2nd time either mate
comment by You Can't Buy Class ¯\_/^v^\_/¯ (U12019)
posted on 20/8/17
comment by Tu Meke Santi (U3732)
posted 27 minutes ago
it wasn't funny the 2nd time either mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted on 20/8/17
comment by You Can't Buy Class (U12019)
posted 10 hours, 17 minutes ago
Initial replays made it look like half of one of his studs was offside but that was simply great work by the cameraman trying to cover the Assistant Refs biased decisions all game long.
...
😂
comment by Choice City (U6187)
posted on 20/8/17
If we're all being sensible it was 1-2 with the penalty and valid goal, if they really want the 3 points, whatever, they can have them, but was 1-2
posted on 20/8/17
Its funny seeing Wenger and Arsenal fans thinking offside goals are onside Specialist in failure mindset. Good job the linesmen flagged otherwise Arsenal would have got a goal they shouldn't have.
posted on 20/8/17
http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/stoke-1-arsenal-0-graham-poll-clarifies-offside-rule-after-alexandre-lacazette-s-disallowed-strike/story-30489222-detail/story.html
Its funny so much moaning about a decision that was correct.
comment by Choice City (U6187)
posted on 20/8/17
Was onside, whatever "evidence" you're looking is misleading and incorrect, they're saying his foot was offside, but they're basing that on a photograph taken a fraction after the ball was passed, they're simply wrong
comment by Choice City (U6187)
posted on 20/8/17
comment by Posh Mufc Great Hafi Not Arrogant Just Better (U6578)
posted 3 hours, 28 minutes ago
http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/stoke-1-arsenal-0-graham-poll-clarifies-offside-rule-after-alexandre-lacazette-s-disallowed-strike/story-30489222-detail/story.html
Its funny so much moaning about a decision that was correct.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the FIFA referee rules, regarding offside. It specifically says "if an AR is not totally sure about an offside offense, the flag should not be raised". The assistant referee wasn't totally sure.
comment by You Can't Buy Class ¯\_/^v^\_/¯ (U12019)
posted on 21/8/17
comment by Choice City (U6187)
posted 16 hours, 42 minutes ago
Was onside, whatever "evidence" you're looking is misleading and incorrect, they're saying his foot was offside, but they're basing that on a photograph taken a fraction after the ball was passed, they're simply wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dis
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available