May the victims of that tragic day RIP. I remember it all too well sadly. I was at college and all hell broke loose when the news filtered through.
With it being the anniversary yesterday, lots of videos were brought back to people's attention about possible conspiracies etc. 16 years on......what are people's thoughts on that tragic day? Terrorist plot or something more evil and sinister from within?
I have never been one for conspiracy theories personally. I get why they exist and near enough every large scale global event has them. The moon landing being a prime example. Millions of people don't believe we actually landed on the moon for example where as I do. However I must say there's some really suspicious events linked to 9/11, none more so than the very suspicious collapse of tower 7 that was neither hit by a plane nor a falling tower. In fact buildings much closer to the two towers than building 7 stayed completely intact.
What do people believe after all these years?
9/11 - thoughts 16 years on
posted on 14/9/17
I never said it was, my point was that not enough people focus on finding out about it, which would be time better served than focussing on some of the theories about what happened on the day.
posted on 15/9/17
comment by joely_the_goaly. (U15498)
posted 15 minutes ago
Bearing that in mind i find it very hard to believe if a plane hit they didn't get some kind of film clip/picture
=========
But there is footage of it. do you honestly expect to see with the camera resolution it had to capture every minute detail of a plane travelling hundreds of miles per hour? you have to also consider the physical evidence such as the plane debris and the DNA evidence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say capture every minute, a single picture of the plane will do.
sorry I've not seen a picture/footage of a plane
can you provide please
==========
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77
there you go. if you still don't believe it can you explain the physical evidence such as debris and human remains (DNA)?
posted on 15/9/17
The amount of state sponsored online propagandists in this country is sickening.
posted on 15/9/17
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/9/17
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
I never said it was, my point was that not enough people focus on finding out about it, which would be time better served than focussing on some of the theories about what happened on the day.
-------
I find that presumptuous which history teaches us to guard against.
I'd say everything needs time commitment. Until one reaches a satisfying conclusion, having a preference or bias towards one aspect could mean total failure.
Don't get me wrong though, I completely get you're point.
posted on 15/9/17
comment by RonaldVilliers - Shoogly Pegro! (U21490)
The amount of state sponsored online propagandists in this country is sickening.
------
Not on sites like JA Too small-time.
Only Melton seems smart enough, the others are too thick to be recruited by anyone.
posted on 15/9/17
Apart from I'm actually arguing against the state more than you are
posted on 15/9/17
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Apart from I'm actually arguing against the state more than you are
-------
To lure us into a false sense of security.
You're good at this.
posted on 15/9/17
Ha!
posted on 30/8/18
_/﹋\_
(҂`_´.)
<,︻╦╤─ ҉ - -
_/﹋\_