Liverpool sign £160m sponsorship deal

No idea Kash...I got that info from a tweet.

So basically take United out of the equation and we have got the market rate.

Not sure how trustworthy this site is

https://sillyseason.com/list/top-10/most-expensive-kit-suppliers-deals-in-football-68623/

meh.

its pretty much just carry one which is worrying as realistically as CL winners we are undervaluing ourselves now.

new balance have it too easy and i am sure if we pushed we could get a much better deal but i think gloablly FSG make more so they are happy.

Standard chartered are an inoffensive branding on our shirts TBH but i'm sure there's more money out there

It's only 4 years.

comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 22 minutes ago
meh.

its pretty much just carry one which is worrying as realistically as CL winnerswe are undervaluing ourselves now.

new balance have it too easy and i am sure if we pushed we could get a much better deal but i think gloablly FSG make more so they are happy.

Standard chartered are an inoffensive branding on our shirts TBH but i'm sure there's more money out there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
our shirt deal is different though, im sure we get a higher % than other clubs do

comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 3 hours, 49 minutes ago
Too cheap...

We should be getting £60m a year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, Chelsea's kit deal is £60m a year from 2 years ago.

Over the past few years Chelsea have sold more shirts

If this was the kit deal, you might have a point

oh yeah this is just the sponsor ima shut up

Chelsea negotiated £40m a year back in 2015 for sponsors