Spudlingtons cannot sell out Wembley

comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 53 minutes ago
Fa case

CFC rage typing here
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Like the expression rage-typing...

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by wearethefamousTHFC (U19211)
posted 3 hours ago
Chelsea couldn't sell they tickets for semi final against Spurs.. plastic mugs
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really? Is that the one you lost 5-1 or 4-2. Both fire drills were equally mpressive tbf.

Jeez, the FA have now given Spurs permission to play at Wembley 'indefinately'.

I reckon this new stadium is really a hoax, it's not actually being built.

comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 day ago
Jeez, the FA have now given Spurs permission to play at Wembley 'indefinately'.

I reckon this new stadium is really a hoax, it's not actually being built.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is as embarrassing as their support

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Jeez, the FA have now given Spurs permission to play at Wembley 'indefinately'.

I reckon this new stadium is really a hoax, it's not actually being built.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

57000 empty seats v Saints. 33k crowd

comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted on 14/10/18
City are a good side, but unless you're ten you should know how City went from an ugly moth to a butterfly...Buying and overspending on best players

Yet money spent to attract the best players does not always translate into more attendances

When a club has fake fans, those who are as temporary in their support as the changing of seasons, then it makes sense why the terraces are still empty whenever City play

If you look at the stats of lowest attendance, you'd think City, "this big" club would have better attendance than Spurs but City has lower lowest attendance than Spurs.

City's lowest is : 53,407 whereas Spurs lowest is 65,270.

Even West Ham have a better lowest attendace than City

Only United has a better record than Spurs

Reason Spurs need a new stadium.

Spurs fans are more die hard fans, not fake glory hunters.

The difference translate into crowd going to watch matches and show support

From Wiki:

In the 2003 close season, the club moved to the new City of Manchester Stadium. The first four seasons at the stadium all resulted in mid-table finishes.

Only 15 years ago

And
By 2008, the club was in a financially precarious position. Thaksin Shinawatra had taken control of the club a year before, but his political travails saw his assets frozen.[30] Then, in August 2008, the club was purchased by the Abu Dhabi United Group

Only ten years

Whatever the current status is, it's all down to the money pumped into the club.

It's not like City didn't get a large helping hand.


Otherwise, you'd probably be playing Leeds next week in the championship

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Were you one of the 33k v Saints?

Or one of the 32000 empty seats for a CL game against multiple European cup winners Inter?