But need Liverpool to drop some points! They seem to be able to stumble to 3 points most weeks whereas when we had a bad spell we got zilch. Maybe it is their year after all. I think they will drop points against the Rags but not sure anyone else is good enough to take points off them sadly.
Anyone care to explain the non-penalty? Not that it matters really, just curious.
Easy enough
posted on 21/1/19
Hoody and bomdia
Hope this helps. Good luck:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learning/subjects/maths.shtml
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 3 minutes ago
Hoody and bomdia
Hope this helps. Good luck:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learning/subjects/maths.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up Dev. You’ve made your point.
And Alli is out too so that takes the percentage over 50 pc
posted on 21/1/19
Silly cild. If you have a PhD in a numerate subject i am happy to learn from you. If not then take your pedantry elsewhere than the City board.
posted on 21/1/19
Am I safe in saying that Spurs have now lost half or over half of their goal scorers, with Ali is out?
posted on 21/1/19
We only deal in precise percentages on this article.
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love the analogies made by desperate people on 606
It's normally mortgages or used cars in relation to net spend, bollox like that, but payrise percentages is a new one.
Carry on
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love the analogies made by desperate people on 606
It's normally mortgages or used cars in relation to net spend, bollox like that, but payrise percentages is a new one.
Carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes it easier for simpletons to understand
posted on 21/1/19
Yeah? You sound like a fvcking geek mate.
"Two players that are injured have scored half your goals"
"Actually I think you'll find that you're 4.6% out"
posted on 22/1/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 9 hours, 12 minutes ago
Yeah? You sound like a fvcking geek mate.
"Two players that are injured have scored half your goals"
"Actually I think you'll find that you're 4.6% out"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worse than that.
There’s something serious going wrong with his real life that he feels the need to bring a generalisation to within 5 decimal points, and argue the toss over it with internet strangers.
posted on 22/1/19
Woohoo, I think its Aspergers so I will leave it. Doesn't excuse the childish insults though but explains the detail focus at the expense of the big picture.