Daniel James

I would swap Clarke for James if they give us £300 million too

Swap Clarke for James

Never getting that much for him and as he's only got 18 months left, they might not get anything. £5million is as high as they could get, and that would be lower in the summer.

Swansea are apparently under pressure to sell someone, so unless they shift a big earner which is unlikely as no one wants them, they will have to sell James.

A few million for James and why on earth would you swap him for Clarke? Utter madness

Phil Hay reckons that Leeds still believe that they can do a deal, and that the upfront price would be nowhere near 12 million.

comment by montleeds (U18330)

posted 21 hours, 28 minutes ago

no more loans please.

According to the BBC there has been a 100% loan signings made in this window alone.

Don't know what to make of that, seems not right in my opinion but I can't quite figure out why it seems wrong

“According to the BBC there has been a 100% loan signings made in this window alone.”

What does this mean?

comment by JonnyLosAngeles (My Dad was made in Leeds) (U9756)
posted 4 hours, 51 minutes ago
“According to the BBC there has been a 100% loan signings made in this window alone.”

What does this mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There has been 100 loan deals this window, representing approximately 50% of all transfers.

There's a rogue % symbol in the original statement, so it makes no sense.

As Colin would say, "he's had his head turned." Isn't it great that his head is turning towards us?

comment by Have You Hird About Kevin? (U21195)
posted 13 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by JonnyLosAngeles (My Dad was made in Leeds) (U9756)
posted 4 hours, 51 minutes ago
“According to the BBC there has been a 100% loan signings made in this window alone.”

What does this mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There has been 100 loan deals this window, representing approximately 50% of all transfers.

There's a rogue % symbol in the original statement, so it makes no sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------