or to join or start a new Discussion

66 Comments
Article Rating 3 Stars

Top 6 Transfers and Agents Fees

1 Chelsea £189m - £26,850,552
2 Liverpool £163.98m - £43,795,8635
3 Man Utd £74.43m - £20,759,350
4 Arsenal £73.35m - £11,181,730
5 Man City £69.38m - £24,122,753
6 Tottenham £0 - £11,141,255


Full marks to City for spending the 2nd least amount of money yet still in for another 3 trophies to add to the 2 they have already won.

Special mention to Spurs for spending fek all but still managing to keep a top 4 spot in sight.


posted on 6/4/19

Thörgen,

I can’t think of any that fall under that bracket tbh, at least no more than we do now if you’re only talking about the p&l.

posted on 6/4/19

Well no. City were fined and had their squad capped. That's the doping.
---------------------------------------------------------
That was 5 years ago and all it did was highlight how corrupt UEFA are.

posted on 6/4/19

comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Well no. City were fined and had their squad capped. That's the doping.
---------------------------------------------------------
That was 5 years ago and all it did was highlight how corrupt UEFA are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes I know it was five years ago but you asked for example and there it is. City broke the rules to get where they are pure and simple.

Tbh I don't care. You'll never see me moaning about that side of things, although I may use it as a mitigating circumstance. Do I think Liverpool would have more trophies were it not for Chelsea and City? Absolutely. Do I think we'd have less trophies had we not done similar ourselves in previous decades. Yep.

posted on 6/4/19

We didn't break the rules as they stood, they were changing retrospectively to catch City out which is why we boo the UEFA 'anthem'.

The rules we 'broke' were nothing either, a couple of Million over budget or similar to what Platini picked up in bribes during his tenure.

posted on 6/4/19

Yes well I suspect there's a lot we don't know with regards to the financing of City's unprecedented meteoric rise to profitable footballing super power be that in the guise of FFP, image rights, sponsorship or investment.

posted on 6/4/19

Comment Deleted by Article Creator

posted on 6/4/19

That was 5 years ago and all it did was highlight how corrupt UEFA are.
=======
More nonsense.

Just because UEFA is corrupt doesn't mean City didn't dope the fack outta the game.

posted on 6/4/19

How? You keep going on about doping but you haven't quoted a single instance.

posted on 7/4/19



With respect, I don't have the motivation to demonstrate to a City fan how dopey their club is. The dodginess, delusion and denial is too strong in that respect.

posted on 7/4/19

So you can find time to band about accusations but can't be motivated to elabaorate on your claims.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 3 from 2 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available