Riyad Mahrez

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Its probably about clickbait, a story slating a £60m United signing will get way more interest than a City counterpart.

I'd still take him at OT

He started really well for City but doesn't really fit into their system.

I think he needs a fair run of games before we can say for sure. Did think it was an unnecessary signing at the time however, and my jury is still very much out. He is either trying too hard, or not good enough.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

He still has more than double the amount of goals for City than Sanchez has for us in his United career.

He has also come on as a sub for the vast majority of his appearances. A lot like Solskjaer.

In fact, Solskjaer averaged 11 goals a season for us as a striker. The same as Mahrez has this season, from the bench.

Also Mahrez is a winger and Solkasjer was a striker.

Essentially what we are saying here is Mahrez is awful, but Solksajaher was worse.

No wonder we have struggled since Ole started giving our players finishing lessons.

#Solaksjaerout

I’d be wary about just looking at the stats though, I’d guess a lot of those came in games that were already won.

Stats don't lie

Sane has only started 7 games in last 18 matches and some of them have been against lower league sides.

Can't imagine he's happy about being left out last night for Mahrez who has been awful for City mostly.

Don't sign that contract Leroy. Too good for the Arab club

comment by Andrew Nelson (U1734)
posted 55 minutes ago
Stats don't lie
----------------------------------------------------------------------

70% of stats are made up.

Think about that.