or to join or start a new Discussion

12 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Brendan's Early Affect

I found this article about Brendan Rodgers time at Leicester, very early days but some interesting stats in there, particularly about Vardy, the midfield and starting well, all subjects covered on here recently.

Not sure about the bit where Puel tried counter attacking football like we did in the Title winning year?


He's rejuvenated the midfield, got the best out of Jamie Vardy and improved the Foxes’ form since taking over in February – so what exactly is Rodgers getting right?


Involving Jamie Vardy far more

Claude Puel might have repeatedly insisted that there was no lingering issue with Vardy, but Leicester’s striker likely had a different story to tell. Puel’s demise was death via a thousand cuts, but phasing out a club legend without actually improving the team’s performances is a good way to go about losing all goodwill.

It’s not just that Rodgers has made Vardy feel special (although man management is clearly a large part of the striker’s improvement). He has also found a system that allows Vardy to be more active and involved rather than being left isolated and frustrated.

It is probably the statistic that best describes Rodgers’ impact at Leicester. In his five matches, Vardy has had more than three shots in a league game on three occasions. Before Rodgers arrived, Vardy managed more than three shots in a league game four times in the last 14 months. Make him happy, make Leicester tick, make supporters cheer.

SWITCHING THE SHAPE OF MIDFIELD

Leicester’s default formation under Puel was 4-2-3-1, with two holding midfielders, two wingers and James Maddison playing as a No.10 behind Vardy. That role for Maddison was referenced by Gareth Southgate when explaining why he hadn't made the England senior squad for their recent friendlies. England don’t play with a No.10, so how could Maddison justify a place despite his outrageous chance created statistics? (In Europe's top five leagues this season, only one player – Memphis Depay – has carved out more.)

Rodgers has changed Leicester’s midfield shape to a 4-1-4-1 that easily shifts to a 4-3-3. Wilfred Ndidi is the deep-lying playmaker who breaks things up but then delivers quick passes when the ball is won, earning significant praise from his new manager. Youri Tielemans has been pushed higher up the pitch and closer to Vardy; a move that has transformed Leicester. The Belgian’s passing has always been exemplary, but now he’s doing his work in the final third. Tielemans has contributed four of his five league goals and assists during Rodgers' time in charge.

On the left, Leicester are fluid and hugely effective. Maddison has scope to drift wide and find space, a move that instantly makes him more attractive to Southgate and England. Harvey Barnes is not a natural winger and so drifts infield, but that allows the marauding Ben Chilwell to overlap and provide crosses. That trio will all have designs on breaking into Southgate’s plans over the next two years – not to mention Demarai Gray, too.

Methodical build-up play

One of the criticisms of Puel’s tactics was that Leicester too often relied upon counter-attacking football and were stumped against teams that sat back against them. That style of attack had been so memorably effective in 2015/16, but was undone by Leicester’s defensive frailties (you can’t invite pressure successfully if you can’t actually deal with it) and inefficiencies on the break.

Rodgers prefers a different plan – methodical and considered build-up in Leicester’s own half before passing through midfield. That's the style that he used so successfully at Celtic, honed by the demand from supporters to be proactive rather than reactive. Very few teams try and attack Celtic.

Look at the passing statistics to note the sea change. In Rodgers’ five games, Leicester have completed an average of 402 passes per game, and that includes a game against Burnley during which they played for virtually the entire game with 10 men and ceded possession. In the five matches before Rodgers arrived, the average was 341 successful passes. Without the ball Leicester press and harry, but with it their dynamic changes.

There’s more. The average number of successful passes in their own half in the five games prior to Rodgers’ appointment was 149, but that has risen to a whopping 205 (again, including Burnley). Leicester’s top three matches for passes completed in their own half have all come in Rodgers’ five matches in charge.




comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 10/4/19

Leicester board*

posted on 10/4/19

Interestingly it was this run of games the last Manager would have struggled with going on previous results.

If he's done well for us that should have us 7th, would a top 6 Club look at him?

posted on 10/4/19

Just keep him away from transfers and you guys might just challenge the top6 if you can keep the team together for a few years.

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 10/4/19

always nice for a manager to come in to a decent set of fixtures, be interesting to see how you play at the Etihad

I'd say outside the top 6 NES is probably the next in line for a big club, then Rodgers/Howe probably equal

posted on 10/4/19

We play Man City second from last. I don't think anyone expects anything at the Etihad but there could be some nerves and tired legs around, and we do have someone in Vardy who's scored against them plenty of times before. Either side of that we have Arsenal at home - a real bogey team for us but a team who are struggling away - and Chelsea at home on the final day, who are both unpredictable and may have nothing left to play for except the Europa League trophy. So some fixtures that are tough but interesting for us, particularly if we're properly challenging for 7th and the last Europa League spot.

As for that article, it makes some good points but does miss a couple of key things. It suggests we were playing counterattack under Puel and that wasn't the case: We were trying to play possession football but just weren't any good at it because we were constantly inviting pressure onto ourselves. A reason for having better passing stats in our own half under Rodgers is because we've been successful in pushing the opposition back so it becomes a lot easier. And that relates to the main difference: The pressing is back. We're actually asking questions of the opposition instead of letting them ask tough questions of us. They key now will be to continue that into next season, and hopefully the lure of 7th place and something worth fighting for will help in that.

comment by Jobyfox (U4183)

posted on 10/4/19

“It suggests we were playing counterattack under Puel and that wasn't the case: We were trying to play possession football but just weren't any good at it because we were constantly inviting pressure onto ourselves.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I was going to make precisely that point.

The possession football we tried to play too often unraveled. We kept the ball, but failed to be creative enough in the final third and this only invited pressure. This pressure inevitably led to goals against as we didn’t set up to defend like we did in 15/16: a flat back four that kept it’s shape and backed itself to defend crosses and the second ball.

Not to mention the fact we almost always conceded early, which threw the game plan out of the window. It wasn’t a coincidence that we only looked decent when we played a country attacking style against the better teams.

The frustrating thing is that it only seemed like a few small things for Puel to fix that would have made all the difference. A higher press for a start. Getting one of the attacking three to get closer to Vardy in rotation. Even a thing as simple as leaving somebody up field at a corner. It was all: keep ball, keep ball, run out of ideas, concede a goal, chase game .... again and again. Puel’s lack of flexibility was ultimately his downfall.

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 10/4/19

The possession football we tried to play too often unraveled. We kept the ball, but failed to be creative enough in the final third and this only invited pressure.


this is how we were starting to play under Rodgers

comment by Pickle (U22100)

posted on 10/4/19

...effect






sorry

posted on 10/4/19

Interesting article, TB. I think the biggest change is the pressing - the players look hungry for the first time in a while and we now actually want the ball! Ndidi is unrecognizable compared to earlier in the season and Vards is clearly enjoying himself once again. Happy days. UTF.

posted on 10/4/19

Very interesting tactical observations and I can’t add much more to that other than:

I like it
It’s working
Long may it continue!!

It will be interesting to see if Rodgers can keep this going, but so far he’s hardly put a foot wrong.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available