or to join or start a new Discussion

10 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

How times have changed!

Did we all see wee little sterling slot the ball in for what he thought was his hatrick and run away in celebration....and why wouldn't he, we all know what happened next!

Seeing that made me think about why he left liverpool and what is it, 4yrs later where we are now in comparison. Let me say he was RIGHT to leave at that time, and he has been vindicated because he left to win trophies and he has. However, look now......the team he left is top of the league reached succesive CL semi finals and could make three European finals in three consecutive years with two being the CL.

Our squad has massively improved and our domestic home record cannot be bettered by any in the prem, Anfield is considered by many Europe's hardest away fixture and maybe the only ground where opposition players have openly stated the atmosphere affects their performances.

If we do win something this year then maybe sterling will look back and just wonder to himself, anfield....that crowd...Liverpool in Europe and going for titles again I could have been a hero there....29yrs and over; city cant match the titles, history, aura and European pedigree nor do they generate what makes anfield so difficult for opposition teams. Ah well......u make ur choices such is life; but Anfield for sure is a much happier place than the Etihad

A long may that continue

posted on 19/4/19

If ever there was an article you've written that's guaranteed, heaven-sent to bite you in thearse GB then this is it.

I didn't like the manner of his leaving either, but he's gone, good luck to the boy, he's playing well, but, more importantly, he's nothing to do with us.

posted on 19/4/19

Jtr....its less to do with sterling but more to do with how we are now in comparison to a few yrs ago, I just used sterling as an example....not sure why u have written that reply!

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 19/4/19

but Anfield for sure is a much happier place than the Etihad
---------------------------
I am sure Sterling has a different view, the way your vile fans treated him when he wanted to leave

posted on 19/4/19

comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Jtr....its less to do with sterling but more to do with how we are now in comparison to a few yrs ago, I just used sterling as an example....not sure why u have written that reply!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's definitely not how I read your post, GB.

posted on 19/4/19

All I know is that I am glad we have him. In retrospect, the money City paid for him was money well spent and frankly, an absolute bargain.

Started slow under Pellegrini but Guardiola's impact was noticeable from the offset in terms of his attitude and performance.

He has been immense this season and last. Long may it continue.

Some interesting times ahead for both clubs.

In my opinion, should Liverpool overcome Barcelona in the Semis they will go on to triumph in the Final.

posted on 19/4/19

Yeh I am sure Sterling would give up all his medals to play for a club that has won nothing for close on a decade.

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 19/4/19

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeh I am sure Sterling would give up all his medals to play for a club that has won nothing for close on a decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should he play for Spurs instead?

posted on 19/4/19

Interesting,,,how many CL and Prem titles has Sterling won at City?

posted on 20/4/19

But he would have been poorer staying at Liverpool. He joined City in July 2015 for £180,000 a week after rejecting a £100,000 a week contract to stay at Liverpool. Assuming he would have been on £100K at Liverpool then he would have been about £16 million worse off by staying at Liverpool (£80k x 200 weeks). So not so daft.

posted on 20/4/19

comment by Jordan's O-face (U22023)
posted 3 minutes ago
But he would have been poorer staying at Liverpool. He joined City in July 2015 for £180,000 a week after rejecting a £100,000 a week contract to stay at Liverpool. Assuming he would have been on £100K at Liverpool then he would have been about £16 million worse off by staying at Liverpool (£80k x 200 weeks). So not so daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but even on £100,000 pw he would’ve still earned £20m.

It’s not as if he couldn’t afford the latest DFS sofa if he hadn’t of moved.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available