Please go ahead and ban us for one year or maybe two. Won't make any difference.
Sick and tired of this issue.
Although, it's sad that a source who owns shares in Liverpool FC has decided to come up with this news just 2 days after our PL win.
Sad.
Message to UEFA
posted on 14/5/19
“You could argue there’s still a connection”
Apart from the fact you can’t. NYT haven’t had shares in FSG for 7 years. What’s this connection?
posted on 14/5/19
Did they leave on bad terms? Are they not speaking anymore?
posted on 14/5/19
comment by Boris '#still1st’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Did they leave on bad terms? Are they not speaking anymore?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t know and couldn’t care less. Not me trying to claim some weird conspiracy between the NYT and our owners
posted on 14/5/19
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
“You could argue there’s still a connection”
Apart from the fact you can’t. NYT haven’t had shares in FSG for 7 years. What’s this connection?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly what you just said, which I then argued against the notion of it.
posted on 14/5/19
There's £Billions involved here, you're naive if you don't think that there's dirty tricks afoot.
posted on 14/5/19
comment by Boris '#still1st’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
There's £Billions involved here, you're naive if you don't think that there's dirty tricks afoot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does your tin foil hat interfer with your mobile phone signal?
posted on 14/5/19
comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 46 minutes ago
Imagine thinking city are legit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've not been City for a long old time.
posted on 14/5/19
comment by Glazers_Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 46 minutes ago
Imagine thinking city are legit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've not been City for a long old time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your mind, pre or post Swales? I've always wondered how you'd answer that
posted on 14/5/19
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by Glazers_Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 46 minutes ago
Imagine thinking city are legit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've not been City for a long old time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your mind, pre or post Swales? I've always wondered how you'd answer that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With tumbleweed, it would seem.
posted on 15/5/19
comment by Alex Robert’s Mirkin 4.0 (U21880)
posted 1 day, 7 hours ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 3 minutes ago
Please go ahead and ban us for one year or maybe two. Won't make any difference.
...
You’re not wrong there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------