https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9430520/premier-league-scrap-ffp-short-term-cost-control-stcc-transfer-spending-arsenal/
1. Scrapped purely to avoid having to enforce the rule in regard to Manchester City ( We all know that owner has personally financed them to the tune of way more than 300 mil the last 5 years but we can't have Pep's wins questioned now can we, no no no, football just won't have it).
2 Announcing scrapping is a farce when the rule was never nforced with the biggest offenders anyway.
3. Scrapping now penalises us and the other clubs who played by the rules thee last 10 years and haven't got owners happy to crap money away.
4. Just for the Gooners...
Kroenke has nowhere left to hide his money. FFP don't apply so he needs to pony up or feck off and sell the club to someone who will. Every single one of you ungrateful plastic caaaants responsible for Wenger out chants, banners and rhetoric the last 5 years of his time. BETTER BE JUST AS VIGOROUS in your with your chants banners and rhetoric this coming season to force the greedy yank caaant clearly responsible for half Wenger's problem, out of our club.
If I don't hear and see that with at least the same passion you set upon Wenger with. Then every one of you should just feck off with Kroenke. This season we find out how much the WOBs love their club. If Kroenke ain't put it up for sale by seasons end, the you know for sure, they're all full of crap!
What A Load Of BS
posted on 3/7/19
comment by Cinciwolf---- jealous little scottish to$$er (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 49 seconds ago
Wolves, Everton, Leicester and West Ham have all grown financially.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think any one of them can genuinely match what the big six can spend/pay year on year if FFP exists?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And not just one random summer, i mean year on year over say a decade.
posted on 3/7/19
comment by Cinciwolf---- jealous little scottish to$$er (U11551)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Cinciwolf---- jealous little scottish to$$er (U11551)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 49 seconds ago
Wolves, Everton, Leicester and West Ham have all grown financially.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think any one of them can genuinely match what the big six can spend/pay year on year if FFP exists?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And not just one random summer, i mean year on year over say a decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.
posted on 3/7/19
FFP didn't stop growth - things like building new stadiums was not included.
posted on 3/7/19
The rule was totally illogical, it's good that they scrapped it. If a club has money to spend they should be allowed to spend it how they want. It's just the wage rule they scapped all the other bits of FFP still apply.
posted on 3/7/19
posted on 3/7/19
“1. Scrapped purely to avoid having to enforce the rule in regard to Manchester City ( We all know that owner has personally financed them to the tune of way more than 300 mil the last 5 years but we can't have Pep's wins questioned now can we, no no no, football just won't have it”
We don’t need this rule scrapped at all. It will be for others benefit far more than ours.
posted on 3/7/19
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 47 seconds ago
“1. Scrapped purely to avoid having to enforce the rule in regard to Manchester City ( We all know that owner has personally financed them to the tune of way more than 300 mil the last 5 years but we can't have Pep's wins questioned now can we, no no no, football just won't have it”
We don’t need this rule scrapped at all. It will be for others benefit far more than ours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, why would scrapping a rule City didn't bother about benefit them?
posted on 3/7/19
We did bother about it though? That was one of the main reasons Soriano was brought in. Also, due to the uefa sanction, that isn’t something we could fudge even if we wanted to.
posted on 3/7/19
Op sounds like a City fan.
posted on 4/7/19
I thought fake sponsorships were the way around this rule anyway? So scrapping it actually negatively effects City