Just putting this out there ...

How much have City earned?

You know the Sheikh has been doping up your deals but you pretend not to know. Perhaps you're not a business type person but for any institution to spend 30 times its purchase price in the following 10 years is undescribably ree tarded and a death sentence to opposition. Its only allowed because of corruption and the fact that football is just a game.

Even now City have next to no fans compared to other clubs of similar size. Most income is from deals.

As I said, the rocket has taken off. It will always be that City doped but if I were you I'd deal with this and stop burying my head in the sand and still enjoy my team thereafter.

If we could skip all the pretence and head burying, we could have a debate. I'm just not willing to go back and forth explaining and stating facts I'm sure you are aware of.

Unless you've got something fresh, I'm off.

Yes, how much have City earned over this 10 year period.

Has the Sheikh been doping up the money we’ve received from TV, from PL participation and success, champions League revenue, as well as all these other sources you’ve actually failed to name?

“Explaining and stating facts”

You’re not explaining anything! You’re effectively ranting. Saying the same thing over and over, getting little digs in, and not answering any question put to you.

So, unless you’ve got something fresh, then yes, please, do go away.

Has the Sheikh been doping up the money we’ve received from TV, from PL participation and success, champions League revenue, as well as all these other sources you’ve actually failed to name?
========
No he's been doping other stuff and that's not debatable, you just like to pretend you don't know. Like clockwork.


“Explaining and stating facts”

You’re not explaining anything!
========
I didn't say I was explaining and stating facts. I said I wouldn't explain and state facts. Genius. Learn to read before gobbing off as this little rant of yours is pointless.


So, unless you’ve got something fresh, then yes, please, do go away.
=====
Attacking me is fresh but I don't wanna stick around for that either.

See ya.

Again another post that offers nothing.

I’m being quite civil with you. The only thing I want you to do is to explain and state facts, but you’re refusing to do so.

so you admit we have earned money legitimately then?

So I’ll ask the question again:

How much have a City earned over the last 10 years?

You can separate your figure into two sections if you wish:

1) an amount that you regard to be legitimate earnings

2) an amount that you regard to have been “doped up”

comment by Thörgen Kloppinson, First of mine own nameth, h'rald of demise, songbird of Asgard, defend'r/ protecteth'r of the weak and innocent, mast'r of disast'r, king of stingeth, dancing destroyeth'r and counteth of monte fisto (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
I’ve no idea if it is or if it isn’t, what exactly are you saying we’ve done and are doing? As I’m not sure how we can agree or disagree to something that you haven’t actually defined.

Are you saying we’re still being funded by the owner, is that it?
======
First paragraph is fidgeting. If you don't know what your own club has been up to his cab we have a debate? If you need me to tell you what City have done then how can you argue your head is not in the sand. Utter fidgeting and a waste of time.

As for Paragraph 2, you'd love me to be saying that because there is no proof. City is like a rocket that required a lot of energy (doping) to take off but now the rocket has exited the influence of earth's gravitational field and can go on forever without the need for further doping.

However, knowing your owners and the way they operate, there are no guarantees your deals are still not doped up by him.

Not rocket sconce.


Ripley
City have spent over 3 billion in players and wages under the sheikh having been purchased for what? 100m. Not sure as I checked this a long time ago but you can check for yourself, no? Wages alone was 1.7 billion about one or two years ago, no?

I could be wrong though. It could be City have spent 30 times the value they were purchased for. You do that with one company in any industry and collapse of the industry is imminent. Its never happened before and is dangerous to the game.

Utter doping if we're being honest here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Genuine question, are you just wumming? As from that, your main point seems to be that Mansour invested heavily in us to get us where we are. I agree with you, I’m not sure how else to say that.

I don’t know if that’s what you mean by the term doping though as it doesn’t actually have a definition. All I’m trying to do is clarify if you’re meaning something else than that.

“However, knowing your owners and the way they operate, there are no guarantees your deals are still not doped up by him.“

Also, just on that, knowing what about our owner?

Melts am just trying to find out the difference between our chairman doping the club and the Moore's family bankrolling Liverpool and Everton for about 40 years.

Just a little perspective about a club that prides itself on history. LFC spent most of the 1950's in the second division, their rise in the 60's has been put down to one of the greatest managers ever seen in England. Shanks was quite honestly a footballing genius.
However like Pep he couldn't have done it without the money provided by the Moores family which started their "bankrolling" in the late 50's early 60's and that lasted for over 50 years.
Coincidence that those years have been the most successful in Liverpools history? I think not.
This is the problem with clubs touting their history, its very easy to look up the facts and cause and effect.

Personally i’m no longer interested in the fact that every single big club has had significant investment at some point in its history. Nor that that investment was often the catalyst for a club becoming a big club to begin with.

The only reason you mentioned Liverpool Lee is because Mamba is a Liverpool fan.

It’s irrelevant to me who Mamba supports. He’s not talking about Liverpool. He’s having a dig at City. Instead of replying by directing the conversation away from City and in to Liverpool, I personally would rather try and engage him in regards to what he’s said about City.

It’s proving to be quite difficult though to get him to explain his comments and back up his accusations.

Which is frustrating to be honest.

Perhaps you're not a business type person but for any institution to spend 30 times its purchase price in the following 10 years is undescribably ree tarded and a death sentence to opposition. Its only allowed because of corruption and the fact that football is just a game.
---------------------------------------------------------

Are you unemployed or are you a professional wummer?