Daniel Sturridge banned and fined

comment by (kash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times Baby (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
That dog thing was dodgy as fek. Publicity stunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know for a fact it was the dog’s idea. No way Sturridge could think such a scheme up.

comment by (kash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times Baby (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
That dog thing was dodgy as fek. Publicity stunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel a paddy power advert coming

comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 32 minutes ago
All sat round the table at the next family meal, glaring at him.

"yeah...cheers for the tip Danny..."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And ratted him out to FA as punishment ?

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by (kash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times Baby (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
That dog thing was dodgy as fek. Publicity stunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know for a fact it was the dog’s idea. No way Sturridge could think such a scheme up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As if there's another dog as intelligent as Triffic 'Arry's.

comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 35 minutes ago
so he didnt even win the bet
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Kunta Kante (U1641)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 32 minutes ago
All sat round the table at the next family meal, glaring at him.

"yeah...cheers for the tip Danny..."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And ratted him out to FA as punishment ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
u know that

So the governing body, from which the judicial body which passes judgement and sentence and is wholly independent of the governing body, wants to influence them by, in this instance at least increasing the sentence (and undermining their independence in the process).

Maybe, just maybe there's a bug going round. It affects people's minds and judgement.

Maybe it contagious!

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 4 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by (kash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times Baby (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
That dog thing was dodgy as fek. Publicity stunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know for a fact it was the dog’s idea. No way Sturridge could think such a scheme up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As if there's another dog as intelligent as Triffic 'Arry's.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t get the fuss over Arry’s dog. It was writing cheques it couldn’t cash.

comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 hours, 24 minutes ago
The FA is appealing as well, as they do not think that the punishment is not strong enough.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Double negative

comment by JimmyTheRed (U1682)
posted 22 hours, 44 minutes ago
So the governing body, from which the judicial body which passes judgement and sentence and is wholly independent of the governing body, wants to influence them by, in this instance at least increasing the sentence (and undermining their independence in the process).

Maybe, just maybe there's a bug going round. It affects people's minds and judgement.

Maybe it contagious!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What are you talking about?

The FA as the complainant, wishes to appeal to increase the length of the punishment. They are perfectly entitled to do this because the judiciary in the matter is independent.

Sturridge, as the guilty party, is equally able to appeal for a shorter sentence if he wants.