or to join or start a new Discussion

31 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

So.....No ban for City.

Is this because it’s a “first offence" and Chelsea allegedly have form? Or should Chelsea feel a tad peeved at this?

For me, i am happy with the ban, because i think long term it's the best thing (although not intended to) that could have happened to our club.

But as the Kakuta ban was overturned. Officially this is Chelsea's first offence. Should there not be a level of consistency?

posted on 14/8/19

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 9 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 minutes ago
The problem is that fining City that amount is much like confiscating the small change from a driver’s pocket.

Meaningless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That is very true. The fact it was monetary rather rather than a ban does show it wasn’t as serious as others though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Surely there is something better than money though, given the amount of money in the game today? It just doesn't work as a deterrent, does it.

posted on 14/8/19

Yes, I’d say the transfer ban. I think if any of ours had happened after the guidance was issued, we’d have had that to (albeit probably only one window)

posted on 14/8/19

Just read an article stating that City's violations were in double figures, less than Chelsea but still double figures.

The Sheikh+Football leadership= Brown Envelopeville.

posted on 14/8/19

Chelsea had 92 transfers investigated and were found guilty in 29 cases.
-----

Nice..

posted on 14/8/19

comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 3 hours, 12 minutes ago
Chelsea had 92 transfers investigated and were found guilty in 29 cases.
-----

Nice..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly accidental

comment by Blarmy (U14547)

posted on 14/8/19

I mean we were banned the first time as well

comment by Superb (U6486)

posted on 14/8/19

Uefa loves us

posted on 14/8/19

comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 2 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 3 hours, 12 minutes ago
Chelsea had 92 transfers investigated and were found guilty in 29 cases.
-----

Nice..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly accidental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope you're well Summer.

posted on 14/8/19

comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 2 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 3 hours, 12 minutes ago
Chelsea had 92 transfers investigated and were found guilty in 29 cases.
-----

Nice..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly accidental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope you're well Summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. C how are you? Long time no speak. I hope you are keeping well.

You're very much missed around the boards these days. Hopefully it's just coz you are busy at work and nothing else more serious. Would be good to see a little bit more of you posting, but I'm sure both you and the legend that is Barney will make a reappearance when the time is right.

posted on 14/8/19

comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 8 hours, 25 minutes ago
Just read an article stating that City's violations were in double figures, less than Chelsea but still double figures.

The Sheikh+Football leadership= Brown Envelopeville.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The article was wrong then. We were found guilty of two out of nine. Chelsea were 29 out of 92 (and of two different rules too)

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
1 Vote
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available