or to join or start a new Discussion

46 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

DPL vs Fleetwood

We have until 2 September to bring our squad up to what might be called “full strength" and unfortunately by then we will have competed in 6 league matches and one in the EFL cup (with the consequential loss of money) without a full complement. That could make a huge difference to our points total next May.

The 2 clubs we have played thus far will be more likely to be competing at the wrong end of the table by then, but the one we are up against on Saturday is rather stronger than they were last season when they were just short of the top six. Fleetwood have beaten Peterborough away, Wimbledon at home and most recently lost only narrowly to Forest in the cup. Add to this the fact that their weaker 2018/19 side took all 6 points from us last season and the only conclusion you can reach is that we will be distinctly second favourites.

Talks to sign 2 strikers have been mentioned and a 20-year-old “academical" from Spurs has signed on loan. There has been much speculation about a similar young player from Aston Villa joining who, given the publicity, you would have expected to have been confirmed some time ago.

We put out a strong side mid week. Statistically we were utterly dominant, yet we failed to score against a Grimsby squad XI just like we did in the pre season match and the impression I got from a commentary on iFollow (that reached me only in short snatches) was that we were ineffectual in front of goal. The DFP described Tuesday’s display as “toothless" which is quite extreme for them. DM says that we should not blame the defeat solely on the lack of strikers and praised the performance - the only thing lacking, he said, was a goal which actually sounds remarkably closely related to a lack of strikers that are effective.

Perhaps the addition or additions to the playing ranks will inject some vigour into the shooting ability and let us hope our rather inexperienced players we will be capable of countering the gamesmanship that will probably accompany the aggressive footballing style that we can expect from the opposition.

The young man from Spurs took to the field from the subs bench for Sunderland 8 or 9 times last season and scored once, whilst I believe I read that at the same time the potential Villa man was loaned to Carlisle, playing 3 times before being injured. So, the word “potential" is perhaps the most appropriate description to apply to their striking ability. If either does well, they will not be with us next season and as a number of us have observed, the club cannot build long term strength by relying on loanees in key roles. Lower league teams with limited resources have to engage players on relatively short term contracts meaning that there is more of a turnover from one season to the next, but they have to be prepared to shoulder the cost of improving contracts for their core squad to consolidate. This was exactly what were not prepared to do for Andrew, now playing for a this very club based in a Blackpool suburb with support and a ground that is probably the smallest in this league. Marosi preferred the terms offered by a club with a history of instability playing away from its home town. Some might feel rather ashamed of our club in these circumstances which was compounded by the departure of two former captains, one of whom walked straight into a top Championship’s starting 11 and scored on his debut. Discounting Lawlor whose weaknesses saw him lose his place to Marosi, the replacements for the other 3 might be said to be unproven as yet – at best.

McCann was notable for his speed of recruitment compared with for example Dickov who used the excuse of due diligence and then, at the last minute, signed players that he had known well at Oldham! You can be too cautious or you can haggle too long if your priority is the cheapest possible deal which probably equates with the least valuable players. The degree of risk in an annual squad-renewal policy requires a McCann approach so that there is the greatest possible selection of players available even if you do have to pay a bit more for them. So, at this stage of the season the priority should surely be to get the right players in asap; time for driving a hard bargain is not available.

Will anyone in red and white find the net? I fear the worst, but obviously hope that we might defy expectations. I have to be realistic though and say 0-2 to them.

posted on 20/8/19

Its the Bolton sanction for the Brentford game that has still to be resolved I understand. So in that case the EFL set a precedent and so shouldn't Rovers be awarded the game 1-0?

posted on 20/8/19

Though in that case there wasnt time to replay it before the end of the season. Interesting to see what and when the EFL does.

posted on 20/8/19

Bolton have an active JA606! So you can read what their fans think about their current predicament.

posted on 20/8/19

I read some twitter stuff this morning and some of them were claiming that they had 9 teenagers in the team last Saturday.
Just a pack of lies.

posted on 21/8/19

Hound: having referred to the OS of BWFC it is indeed untrue that there were as many as 9. More than half were, but that is simply a cross-section of their playing staff.

Having taken their place in the league with a staff heavily weighted towards youthful players they well knew the shape the fixtures would take with matches twice a week at this stage of the season. This was the Contract and they knew that they had to make do with those players who were already on their books, having been prohibited from registering new players by the EFL.

Their defence may well amount to just this, but they went into the season with their eyes open and it seems wrong to me that they will be given a concession unavailable to the other clubs in the League.

If clubs are permitted to judge whether they are able to fulfil their fixtures based on the assumed age-related resilience of the team they are able to put out, then clubs with sides with an average age of over 30 could well justify not playing more than once a week.

Health epidemics and major injury crises have seemingly had favourable consideration in very recent years probably because such events are out of the control of the affected clubs.

Rovers, in common with all the other clubs whose seasons have or will be disrupted by the misdemeanours of Bolton and Bury will (if they are allowed to continue) have to fit in an extra match or matches at such a time inconvenient for both club and fans meaning a potential disadvantage to the innocent parties.

The EFL statement uses rather empathetic words like “acutely aware” in its statement and gives no indication of what will happen next, if anything. Rovers will doubtless make representations which will force them into a judgment. Bury might feel that at this stage they sound more sympathetic than they are to them.

It illustrates the problem with any Sentence that is suspended and poses the question “When is a punishment not a punishment?” The fact is that the risk of consequence falls on everyone else with whom the offender has contact.

posted on 21/8/19

It sems to me under most interpretations of EFL and FIFA rules that Bolton effectively forfeited the game. Therefore Rovers should be awarded the points. FIFA rules say 3-0 but who can be sure what the EFL rules are , what they will do and when!

posted on 21/8/19

We now have a statement from the EFL which is aimed at adverse comment by the managers of Fleetwood and Sunderland following the Bolton postponement:

"... a spokesperson for the EFL said: "While accepting everyone is entitled to their opinion, we have repeatedly stated that the integrity of the league competition remains of paramount importance and any club that doesn't fulfil a fixture will face a sporting sanction.

- https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/49420909

posted on 22/8/19

I keep hearing and reading rubbish regarding the child welfare of the players who have played recently however only 2 lads who played against Tranmere were under adult age 17. Even I will go on to say they had 4 experienced players in that team also. I also noticed Parkinson was the forefront behind the postponement but he's since resigned from the club.

posted on 22/8/19

Agreed azza about the young lads.
On the Bolton 606 page though I noticed that a couple of their posters were claiming that nine of the team that started at Tranmere were “kids”.

posted on 7/12/19

.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available