or to join or start a new Discussion

301 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Possibly No Transfers in Jan

"No deals are imminent for #mufc and although discussions are ongoing, there is a realistic possibility that the club finish the transfer window without any new signings

United are still in talks with Sporting to sign Bruno Fernandes but the sides remain a long way from agreeing a deal. The club are conscious that overpaying for Bruno could lead to selling clubs inflating the price of players in the summer." #mufc [@David_Ornstein, The Athletic]


Well then. It's clear we need more players. It's clear we need a ST or another attacker and a midfielder minimum. I get we don't want to overpay, but when you NEED something, you got to go out and get it.

Transfer window closes in a couple of days, let's see what happens.

posted on 27/1/20

comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
He argued it being a negative.

Your defence of him is touching though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You claimed something and couldn't prove it

Poor form
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fid you not see where he said Woodward said was better than refusing to answer?

posted on 27/1/20

Going by all the filtered signs I will guess RDD went to some great trouble to not prove that I said “it was a good thing”.

posted on 27/1/20

That's enough for ome night.

Have fun tonight you 3. X

comment by Shugs (U14253)

posted on 27/1/20

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
He argued it being a negative.

Your defence of him is touching though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You claimed something and couldn't prove it

Poor form
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fid you not see where he said Woodward said was better than refusing to answer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You insisted he said it was a good thing... And he didn't actually say that

If you can't understand what people mean just ask

comment by Shugs (U14253)

posted on 27/1/20

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 9 minutes ago
Going by all the filtered signs I will guess RDD went to some great trouble to not prove that I said “it was a good thing”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Pretty much... He's off to wet the bed now

posted on 28/1/20

comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
He argued it being a negative.

Your defence of him is touching though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You claimed something and couldn't prove it

Poor form
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fid you not see where he said Woodward said was better than refusing to answer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You insisted he said it was a good thing... And he didn't actually say that

If you can't understand what people mean just ask
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didnt insist. And i wasnt quoting him.and it's clear from his comments he didnt think it a bad thing that Woodward told the world he could pay £70m.

Enjoy guys. But be safe. Wear protection.

posted on 28/1/20

comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 9 minutes ago
Going by all the filtered signs I will guess RDD went to some great trouble to not prove that I said “it was a good thing”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Pretty much... He's off to wet the bed now
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope his doll doesn’t get soaked.

comment by Shugs (U14253)

posted on 28/1/20

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
He argued it being a negative.

Your defence of him is touching though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You claimed something and couldn't prove it

Poor form
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fid you not see where he said Woodward said was better than refusing to answer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You insisted he said it was a good thing... And he didn't actually say that

If you can't understand what people mean just ask
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didnt insist. And i wasnt quoting him.and it's clear from his comments he didnt think it a bad thing that Woodward told the world he could pay £70m.

Enjoy guys. But be safe. Wear protection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"He did Shugs. Il go find it."

And you didn't

Simple as that treacle

posted on 28/1/20

The fact that he went to all that trouble to not find what he was looking for is quite sad really.

Yet another RDD spectacular failure.

posted on 28/1/20

comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 9 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
He argued it being a negative.

Your defence of him is touching though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You claimed something and couldn't prove it

Poor form
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fid you not see where he said Woodward said was better than refusing to answer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You insisted he said it was a good thing... And he didn't actually say that

If you can't understand what people mean just ask
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didnt insist. And i wasnt quoting him.and it's clear from his comments he didnt think it a bad thing that Woodward told the world he could pay £70m.

Enjoy guys. But be safe. Wear protection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"He did Shugs. Il go find it."

And you didn't

Simple as that treacle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The thread is there for everyone to read should they wish. VC was clearly not against Woodward telling the world we have X amount to spend.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available