https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11820/11938417/psg-president-nasser-al-khelaifi-charged-for-bribing-ex-fifa-secretary-general-jerome-valcke
Of course he is innocent
posted on 21/2/20
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 39 minutes ago
Fack me you two league eagles. Next time I get a parking ticket I am posting here for advice from you two
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take a leaf out of mambas book and spend 5 minutes on Wikipedia to research your response
posted on 21/2/20
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 7 hours, 44 minutes ago
Fack me you two league eagles. Next time I get a parking ticket I am posting here for advice from you two
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispute that ticket every time. 🤣👍
posted on 21/2/20
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 7 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 39 minutes ago
Fack me you two league eagles. Next time I get a parking ticket I am posting here for advice from you two
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take a leaf out of mambas book and spend 5 minutes on Wikipedia to research your response
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good one.
posted on 21/2/20
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 7 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 39 minutes ago
Fack me you two league eagles. Next time I get a parking ticket I am posting here for advice from you two
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take a leaf out of mambas book and spend 5 minutes on Wikipedia to research your response
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah no way he did that, do you practice law Klopptimus?
posted on 21/2/20
I can and I have but at the minute I'm doing other things.
You?
posted on 21/2/20
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
I can and I have but at the minute I'm doing other things.
You?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal services. I'm no officer of the court and I don't take money for legal advice. 😎👍
posted on 22/2/20
Does anyone actually know the legal process for CAS. because it seems to me reading through a lot of these posts that the consensus is a hearing and 1 judge to decide the outcome. In Cas they nominate 1 judge, city also, and the same with UEFA. They then look at the merits of the appeal. The UEFA hearing was flawed. The flaws are numerous and have been exposed. When Cas threw out the city case 3 days before the UEFA verdict, it was noted that whilst they came down on the side of UEFA because of the no verdict they stated that the UEFA practises in this case were flawed and that they did show some sympathy to city's cause.
posted on 22/2/20
comment by sterlingsilvagoldera (U4995)
posted 10 hours, 12 minutes ago
Does anyone actually know the legal process for CAS. because it seems to me reading through a lot of these posts that the consensus is a hearing and 1 judge to decide the outcome. In Cas they nominate 1 judge, city also, and the same with UEFA. They then look at the merits of the appeal. The UEFA hearing was flawed. The flaws are numerous and have been exposed. When Cas threw out the city case 3 days before the UEFA verdict, it was noted that whilst they came down on the side of UEFA because of the no verdict they stated that the UEFA practises in this case were flawed and that they did show some sympathy to city's cause.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All explained here I believe:
https://www.tas-cas.org/en/arbitration/code-procedural-rules.html
posted on 23/2/20
thank you sissoko. It was clearly explained in R40 which was the point I referenced in my thread. In the postings it seems that the assumption is it is a court with a judge and a number of lawyers looking at the original findings and finally a jury verdict.
posted on 23/2/20
comment by sterlingsilvagoldera (U4995)
posted 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
thank you sissoko. It was clearly explained in R40 which was the point I referenced in my thread. In the postings it seems that the assumption is it is a court with a judge and a number of lawyers looking at the original findings and finally a jury verdict.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure that's the case, the panel is picked by both sides with a main arbitrator, or that's how I've interpreted it. There is no jury.