Been all over the radio stations today.
Joke original ref decision.
Joke tribunal decision.
Joke overturn.
Joke organisation.
So, everyone and their dug can see its never a dive - clear contact. It gets voted 2-1 at the tribunal. One member says 'they didn't consider all the evidence provided' so Maxwell sacks them and they'll convene a new one. We might get the correct decision, however...
1. What evidence did this person consider, if any? Seems that video evidence and ref report would be the two obvious. Seems like the cant didn't even look at it?
2. Why did they not consider all the evidence?
3. What other panels have they sat on? Feels like they should be null and void?
4. Has this person been paid for their duties and is that money recoverable?
5. On SSB they said the panel would sit for a day ploughing through various disciplinaries - who was the chair making sure all the evidence was considered and why aren't they being sacked too?
6. Who was the other cant that voted it the right decision and why aren't they being sacked?
Etc.
An utter, utter shambles, riddy and borderline corrupt. The clubs need to sack the lot and get in experts to design an organisation fit for purpose.
Keatings
posted on 23/2/20
Listened to shortbread for a bit yesterday. Someone lobbed in that perhaps the panel were of the blue persuasion and Keatings had played in the Hibs SCF win.
But THAT would be scarfy, right? No, no, they've fallen on their sword.
I nearly forgot, he was in Celtic youths too. Ah well.
posted on 23/2/20
As a wee aside, I stumbled on this amusing Guardian capture of the UEFA win at Anfield back in the day. I, of course, am being scarfy because Gerrard once played for Liverpool.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2003/mar/20/minutebyminute.sport
posted on 23/2/20
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t know why folk are having a go at the SFA The clubs could change it in a heartbeat if they acted together
Rangers and Celtic don’t give a fook about Keatings only about bleating when a decision goes against them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against them or even for the other
Tribal nonsense
The SFA are rubbish mind you
But clubs and fans are worse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know I'm not the brightest poster on here but I'm struggling to understand why your response to almost everything is to call it out as scarfy.
The OP is a Celtic fan discussing a matter involving the sfa and a player from a lower league club.
There's seems to be sone interest in it from a number of posters.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't be interested in this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m suggesting that we are selective in our interest
Even your point omits who the decision happened to favour
The clip is probably been cut and saved for the next movie
My regular mention of scarfy posting only reflects the scarfy nature of most posts
As Zach says the clubs could stop such by perhaps saying
Morelos deserved the card
The stamp on the Hamilton guy was just that
The baw grabwas little more than a minor foul
The goal was hand ball or offside
Morelos dive was poor
Etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Silver is being Scarfy at all. I don't see any evidence of scarfiness on this thread.
I suppose if you really want to find it you will.
posted on 23/2/20
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t know why folk are having a go at the SFA The clubs could change it in a heartbeat if they acted together
Rangers and Celtic don’t give a fook about Keatings only about bleating when a decision goes against them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against them or even for the other
Tribal nonsense
The SFA are rubbish mind you
But clubs and fans are worse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know I'm not the brightest poster on here but I'm struggling to understand why your response to almost everything is to call it out as scarfy.
The OP is a Celtic fan discussing a matter involving the sfa and a player from a lower league club.
There's seems to be sone interest in it from a number of posters.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't be interested in this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m suggesting that we are selective in our interest
Even your point omits who the decision happened to favour
The clip is probably been cut and saved for the next movie
My regular mention of scarfy posting only reflects the scarfy nature of most posts
As Zach says the clubs could stop such by perhaps saying
Morelos deserved the card
The stamp on the Hamilton guy was just that
The baw grabwas little more than a minor foul
The goal was hand ball or offside
Morelos dive was poor
Etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Silver is being Scarfy at all. I don't see any evidence of scarfiness on this thread.
I suppose if you really want to find it you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A Celtic fan defending a Celtic fan
Could just be coincidence I guess or more scarfyness
posted on 23/2/20
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/2/20
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/2/20
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 6 minutes ago
At least they have acted and are convening a new tribunal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They might just eventually get it correct
I think the guy misses the final which would be very unfair on him
So let’s hope it’s sorted
posted on 23/2/20
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/2/20
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 1 hour, 48 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t know why folk are having a go at the SFA The clubs could change it in a heartbeat if they acted together
Rangers and Celtic don’t give a fook about Keatings only about bleating when a decision goes against them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against them or even for the other
Tribal nonsense
The SFA are rubbish mind you
But clubs and fans are worse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know I'm not the brightest poster on here but I'm struggling to understand why your response to almost everything is to call it out as scarfy.
The OP is a Celtic fan discussing a matter involving the sfa and a player from a lower league club.
There's seems to be sone interest in it from a number of posters.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't be interested in this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m suggesting that we are selective in our interest
Even your point omits who the decision happened to favour
The clip is probably been cut and saved for the next movie
My regular mention of scarfy posting only reflects the scarfy nature of most posts
As Zach says the clubs could stop such by perhaps saying
Morelos deserved the card
The stamp on the Hamilton guy was just that
The baw grabwas little more than a minor foul
The goal was hand ball or offside
Morelos dive was poor
Etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Silver is being Scarfy at all. I don't see any evidence of scarfiness on this thread.
I suppose if you really want to find it you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A Celtic fan defending a Celtic fan
Could just be coincidence I guess or more scarfyness
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'Defending
Is he under attack?
posted on 23/2/20
Supporting would be a better word