or to join or start a new Discussion

18 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Scaremongering?

By all means - there may be a delay to the start of the season; I can totally see the reasoning behind that.

But to suggest that there is thinking in the upper echelons of the SFA of season 2020-21 being canned is, IMHO, going slightly OTT.

Consider the absolute worst case from a BC perspective but don't go public with it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8282551/Scottish-FA-vice-president-Mike-Mulraney-fears-total-disaster-cancelling-season.html

posted on 3/5/20

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 18 minutes ago
What does BC perspective mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea-means something though and completely changes everything.

In these days when people shout for transparency, people will still get slated for being transparent. It’s weird.

posted on 3/5/20

comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 22 minutes ago
I think it’s positive this is on the table as it would be remiss not to have it there. I appreciate that it might concern some people but it’s a plausible, if unlikely outcome. I’m sure most folk have the ability to realise that this is a relatively remote possibility and thus give it no more or less thought that it warrants. On that basis no problem with sharing that with the paying and viewing public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same here. At a time when no one has a clue as to how this is all going to pan out, when people are getting slated for being underprepared, the people in charge of the game should not show they’re trying to be ready for any eventuality.

posted on 3/5/20

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 22 minutes ago
I think it’s positive this is on the table as it would be remiss not to have it there. I appreciate that it might concern some people but it’s a plausible, if unlikely outcome. I’m sure most folk have the ability to realise that this is a relatively remote possibility and thus give it no more or less thought that it warrants. On that basis no problem with sharing that with the paying and viewing public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same here. At a time when no one has a clue as to how this is all going to pan out, when people are getting slated for being underprepared, the people in charge of the game should not show they’re trying to be ready for any eventuality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



There's a shocker.

Ignores what I said (as it made you look rather silly) but latches on to someone else's valid point who didn't dive in as soon as he saw who the poster was.

Predictable stuff, POV - but not unexpected.

Enjoy your evening.

posted on 3/5/20

‘ Ignores what I said (as it made you look rather silly)’

Except I didn’t. I already said I didn’t know what you meant by BC.

Sorry.

posted on 3/5/20

comment by * (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 22 minutes ago
I think it’s positive this is on the table as it would be remiss not to have it there. I appreciate that it might concern some people but it’s a plausible, if unlikely outcome. I’m sure most folk have the ability to realise that this is a relatively remote possibility and thus give it no more or less thought that it warrants. On that basis no problem with sharing that with the paying and viewing public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same here. At a time when no one has a clue as to how this is all going to pan out, when people are getting slated for being underprepared, the people in charge of the game should not show they’re trying to be ready for any eventuality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



There's a shocker.

Ignores what I said (as it made you look rather silly) but latches on to someone else's valid point who didn't dive in as soon as he saw who the poster was.

Predictable stuff, POV - but not unexpected.

Enjoy your evening.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday shexual tension

comment by atheist (U2783)

posted on 3/5/20

Sexual's ok.

posted on 4/5/20

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 4/5/20

It might be farcical but if it can go ahead it will be a very welcome distraction. I'll take whatever form of it is available

posted on 4/5/20

Need the football back next season. Must be a priority surely? BC , I thought this must mean broadcasting, or TV cameras etc. Agree the emergency plans must consider if the gov advice chooses not to cancel instructions to socially distance. Would have major influence on the delivery.
If they weren't discussing this scenario I'd be more concerned. It shows that they understand what might happen and are preparing for every eventuality.

posted on 4/5/20

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available