or to join or start a new Discussion

33 Comments
Article Rating 1.67 Stars

Gollum

Is spitting feathers that his Penited team did not get their weekly penalty at Stamford Bog.

He has got so used to seeing gifted penalty after gifted penalty, that when it does not come, he is seething with vitriol towards the officials.

As for Roy Keane, somebody should remind this mug that his beloved Penited are only second in the league courtesy of beneficial refereeing.

posted on 1/3/21

comment by merrysupersteve (monitoring the situation) (U1132)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 35 minutes ago
Never a pen. Player raised his arm to brace for impact from he other player so never going to be given under review. Love how united don't get one penalty and their fans are in uproar 😅
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a load of nonsense 🤣. You can't just make up rules to suit your prerogative. If they were never going to give it under review, it was a pretty strange policy to say they thought it was a penalty and get the ref to have a look at it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do realise that the ref going to review it doesn't mean the decision is automatically over turned right?
Wouldve been a joke of a penalty. Even by uniteds standards. I don't support them or Chelsea so there is hardly some warped narrative I'm trying to spin.

posted on 1/3/21

comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm the Mané - PL Champione (U1108)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Lol what about the Maguire/Shaw conspiracy theory which Shaw had to back track after his desperate embarrassing interview where he claimed the ref did not give the pen because it would cause controversy.

Previous week it was the fridge having a meltdown infront of the camera and yesterday it was Shaw.

What a joke club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The famous Rafa rant
King Kenny’s T-shirt campaign
Klopp’s public meltdown about United pens

What was that about joke clubs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love how Klopp has stopped United getting these dodgy pens

Penandes only source of contribution in the big games wiped out.

posted on 1/3/21

My favourite was Ole saying "100% a penalty" ....if that was the case they would've had a penalty 😅

posted on 1/3/21

comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (monitoring the situation) (U1132)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a load of nonsense 🤣. You can't just make up rules to suit your prerogative. If they were never going to give it under review, it was a pretty strange policy to say they thought it was a penalty and get the ref to have a look at it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair to say you can ignore this guy's opinion on anything relating to football:

https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/421632
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/427794
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

posted on 1/3/21

comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 13 minutes ago

----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair to say you can ignore this guy's opinion on anything relating to football:

https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/421632
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/427794
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh dear

posted on 1/3/21

Nice work footy

posted on 1/3/21

comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Nice work footy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
great how some people on here can always find time to post a dozen smileys, but not to read and think

posted on 1/3/21

too many gollums in the PL, i thought the op was talking about west ham.

posted on 1/3/21

comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 5 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Nice work footy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
great how some people on here can always find time to post a dozen smileys, but not tto read and think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same sort of people that try claiming someone doesn't know about football, for saying a highly sought after youngster could be a good buy, but rights him off as rubbish after half a season 😅

Then posts an article asking if united can win the league when even the most hardcore united supporters I've seen have said that's nothing but a silly idea.

Oh dear indeed.

posted on 2/3/21

comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 22 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (monitoring the situation) (U1132)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 35 minutes ago
Never a pen. Player raised his arm to brace for impact from he other player so never going to be given under review. Love how united don't get one penalty and their fans are in uproar 😅
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a load of nonsense 🤣. You can't just make up rules to suit your prerogative. If they were never going to give it under review, it was a pretty strange policy to say they thought it was a penalty and get the ref to have a look at it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do realise that the ref going to review it doesn't mean the decision is automatically over turned right?
Wouldve been a joke of a penalty. Even by uniteds standards. I don't support them or Chelsea so there is hardly some warped narrative I'm trying to spin.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If any of you are familiar with how the DRSsystem works in cricket then this was the footballing equivalent of unpire's call.

The video evidence was not strong enough to suggest that the original decision was a clear and obvious error. Therefore the original decision held. Its how VAR is supposed to work.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1.67 from 6 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available