The club have officially announced on Twitter
Welcome back home , Cristiano!
Discuss!!!!!
He's baaaaaaaack
posted on 27/8/21
It was also before the Varane deal
posted on 27/8/21
comment by Rock Steady (U9953)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 15 seconds ago
Man utd have spent more than city over the last 5 years BEFORE the Ronaldo deal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well that's not true, try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It certainly is liar.
Net spend of clubs over the last FIVE years:
Man Utd - £622.5m
Man City - £518.9m
Arsenal - £331.1m
Chelsea - £230.6m
Tottenham - £201.3m
Liverpool - £159.7m
This was BEFORE the Grealish deal and Ronaldo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now take into Ronaldo's shirt sales and other merchandise into the equation. Not to mention what's happened in the stock market today alone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s happened in the stock market?
posted on 27/8/21
Net spend is a pretty good gauge I find of how frivolous a club is. Obviously we’d trust most clubs to be covered with sponsors and other deals and incomings but net spend is pretty handy to look at as a quick view as usually that has the biggest determinant on signings coming in.
posted on 27/8/21
They simply have to win the league. There can't be an excuse
posted on 27/8/21
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 57 seconds ago
They simply have to win the league. There can't be an excuse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought Liverpool before but now I would concede them and Utd are favourites for me
posted on 27/8/21
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 57 seconds ago
They simply have to win the league. There can't be an excuse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought Liverpool before but now I would concede them and Utd are favourites for me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea look good and have the best manager. They just don't have the financial power of man utd it seems
posted on 27/8/21
If anybody else mentions increased shirt sales as a source of increased revenue for United over this ....
posted on 27/8/21
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Rock Steady (U9953)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 15 seconds ago
Man utd have spent more than city over the last 5 years BEFORE the Ronaldo deal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well that's not true, try again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It certainly is liar.
Net spend of clubs over the last FIVE years:
Man Utd - £622.5m
Man City - £518.9m
Arsenal - £331.1m
Chelsea - £230.6m
Tottenham - £201.3m
Liverpool - £159.7m
This was BEFORE the Grealish deal and Ronaldo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now take into Ronaldo's shirt sales and other merchandise into the equation. Not to mention what's happened in the stock market today alone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s happened in the stock market?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/27/investing/manchester-united-stock-cristiano-ronaldo/index.html
posted on 27/8/21
Just shows that solskjaer is completely in the dark about everything. Only last night he said 'he knows where we are' he is literally the PE teacher
posted on 7/3/22
back