15.30

did he really try and associated Starmer with Jimmy Savile?

this piece of dogchit is just denying everything.

he thinks we are all crackers

#letsgoboris

comment by RB&W - What is it now, Ralf? (U21434)
posted 18 minutes ago
did he really try and associated Starmer with Jimmy Savile?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t believe that. What an absolute piece of sh!t

comment by RB&W - What is it now, Ralf? (U21434)
posted 22 minutes ago
this piece of dogchit is just denying everything.

he thinks we are all crackers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 359 Conservative MPs. If today's events in the house of commons are anything to go by, there will be enough letters going in to spark a leadership election.

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - What is it now, Ralf? (U21434)
posted 18 minutes ago
did he really try and associated Starmer with Jimmy Savile?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t believe that. What an absolute piece of sh!t
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not just false, but it's well documented to be an online smear campaign that was initiated by far-right fringe organisations.

(By the way, isn't it curious that you can slander, defame and lie in parliament for political benefit but it's against the rules to call someone a liar? I can see the benefits of keeping things civil but the system only works if politicians and media hold lies to account.)

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Aren't dogs great. (U3126)
posted 2 hours, 59 minutes ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 5 minutes ago
Disgraceful that this report should be redacted. The full report will likely never be released, which then raises the question, what was the point of it? To waste everyones time until we've all got bored and moved on from PartyGate. After all, whose Greys boss again?

A redacted report should harden everyones resolve to remove these lying scvbags from government
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's right that some of the report be redacted, such as the names of civil servants etc who attended the various parties.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it right that we hide their names?

comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - What is it now, Ralf? (U21434)
posted 18 minutes ago
did he really try and associated Starmer with Jimmy Savile?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t believe that. What an absolute piece of sh!t
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not just false, but it's well documented to be an online smear campaign that was initiated by far-right fringe organisations.

(By the way, isn't it curious that you can slander, defame and lie in parliament for political benefit but it's against the rules to call someone a liar? I can see the benefits of keeping things civil but the system only works if politicians and media hold lies to account.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fcking archaic nonsense conventions from the 17th century FFS

A Dad at my kids nursery is a civil servant for Sunak so it would have been funny if the names of civil servants weren't redacted. He's already looked really nervous since the stories came out.

MET announce their report shouldnt take longer than a year. Probably.