Pathetic manager.
Arsenal were there for the taking but our horrible manager already planned to lose the match.
No quality no fight no plans for the game. Same horrible recycling of the ball over and over again with no output.
Horrible season and cant wait for it to be over. Due to everyone around us being horrible or just slightly puching above their weight we are still in the fight for top 4 but i feel its just a tease, we might just make 5th but i wont bet on that.
We are pathetic, we can't beat any decent sides as we have a manger lacking a tactical brain.
What is the point playing the useless nkunku at wing, what is the point of a horrible Sancho, what is the point playing an extremely slow and limited enzo at 10. What is the point recycing the ball so much with no end product or at least have forwards make runs and defense or mids release those balls on time.
Horrible set up, spent so much money and no strikers good enough to start.
Pathetic football
posted on 16/3/25
Wouldn't say we were there for the taking thought we played alright first half should of been further ahead even given our struggles in attack second half it was a case of us saying come and have a go if you can and you clearly can't. You could of played for another month and you still wouldn't of scored.
posted on 16/3/25
He did his job by letting Arsenal win to stop Liverpool from winning the league.
Chelsea getting knocked out of the CL next season isn't worth helping liverpool win the league this season.
Liverpool will collapse and Arsenal need to be there to win it when they do.
posted on 16/3/25
Thought this was on the spurs board
posted on 16/3/25
Arsenal should have won at least 6-1.
Arsenal were once again denied a stonewall penalty for a blatant handball by Cucurella.
Apart from that it was a pretty painful watch
posted on 16/3/25
Yeah we got the lucky decisions in our favour and still gave Arsenal their easiest game of the season.
In the last 3 months the only PL teams we have beaten are 4 of the bottom 5.
posted on 16/3/25
Chelsea FC is a good example that money can't always solve problems and someone needs to be held accountable????
posted on 17/3/25
comment by Globaled (U7198)
posted 16 hours, 34 minutes ago
Chelsea FC is a good example that money can't always solve problems and someone needs to be held accountable????
------------------------------------------------------
In a broader prospective, we're the best example in football of money being a double edged sword.
It's a tool, NOT an automatic advantage! It can buy anything your heart desires, and destroy it in equal measure if you don't use it properly
posted on 17/3/25
Depends how you spend it and what your priorities are where money is involved if available.
Money the owners have spent has not been prioritised in enhancing the current squad to help achieve a very possible CL place this season.
They spent money yes but failed to address the shortcomings and needs of the squad from last season let alone this season.
That was their choice, even though they themselves must have seen our position back in December and how well placed we were to push on and take a CL place, particularly in the light of such inconsistency among the majority of the teams outside the top two.
Just leaves me with the impression that those in change actually don't care whether we finish in a CL place or not sadly.
Had really high hopes for this season after the progress of last season, personally just wanted a period of stability at the club after all the turmoil and chaos since they took over.
Was more than happy to give MP that second season to see whether he could build on that first season. (what was the point of appointing him in the first place if not?)
Its an absolute mess as far as i'm concerned, 3 years in and this is where we are lol.
The clowns unable to even organise a front of shirt sponsor for a one year deal. 20,30 or even 40m revenue lost which they will no doubt recoup by flogging off another few academy players over the summer.
posted on 18/3/25