Four, that coincindentally is the number of games since you beat us. Also the number of mangers you have had since the Kuwaiti megalomaniac took you over. Also probably the number of working brain cells he has. Possibly the number of games Billy Davies will be in charge at Forest.
How about no fingered gloves, zero being the number of premiership points Forest have accumulated this millenium, or 10 fingered, 10 being the number of players Derby require to beat you over 90 minutes.
I think you might find from medical records that polydactylyl is a more frequent occurence in rural Nottinghamshire than Derbyshire and is very common in Lincolnshire.
I like what you've done there Spartacus although I seriously doubt any medical records anywhere include dinosaurs!
Also, how about an 11 fingered glove? I wonder what that could refer to
What do the in-breds down the A5-2 do about the webbing between their fingers?
The only person I knew who had webbing between their fingers came from Bulwell.
While we are on about numbers does 6 plus the number of times Tonto has seen Forest = 6?
Many years ago I did a PGCE and there was a midwife from Grimsby on the course. As part of the course we had to describe what we did in our jobs (this was for FE/HE). She described how she presented a baby to the parents after it was born. One of the things she said was "we have tied a string round the extra little toe and it should drop off in a few days". Additional digits are more common than many realise as the gene which produces them is dominant.
FYI
It's a three-fingered glove; four-fingered gloves are what normal people wear.
Trust this helps, thicko
You are saying the Simpson's aren't normal people 666?
666 - I trust your comment is aimed at the Telegraph journalist who wrote the original article?
If you look Tonto the Telegraph journalist talks about a three fingered glove. How about a big oops, I should have checked (or should that I should of checked in the modern moronic use of English).
FYI
It's a three-fingered glove; four-fingered gloves are what normal people wear.
Trust this helps, thicko
---------------
Harsh. The article clearly said 'four fingered' this morning and has been edited to three-fingered. If you check the transfer gossip, they are still using four.
Also:
The English word "finger" has two senses, even in the context of appendages of a single typical human hand:
- Any of the five digits.
- Any of the five terminal members of the hand, especially those other than the thumb.
It's a bit like saying someone is in-bred if they have 6 fingers. Or do you think it's odd for people to have 5 fingers 666?
Yes our language is not consistent. When we talk anatomically we normally talk about 4 fingers and a thumb but sartorially we tend to think of gloves as having 5 fingers.
"I meant four-fingered, er three-fingered, er five-fingered.."
If you're thinking about penning a WUM article in future, do yourself a favour and don't, Spacktard
Thank you Spartacus.
You're angrier than usual today 666. Chill out pal, don't let it get to you.
It reads with more venom than was intended, caniggia!
I obviously don't like your racist viewpoints but I respect your right to air them within the boundaries of the House Rules
Oh ok, I'll let you off then.
Is you calling me racist your attempt at a wum? I suppose if people from Derby were a race then that would be a fair accusation.
Oh, I'm sorry; I thought 'racist' was the standard response on 606 now for any comments anyone doesn't like.
Just on the Forest boards then, is it?
Hey hey hey. I didn't accuse anyone of being racist. In fact I said it was a dangerous and offensive thing to go around accusing people of being racist (unless it is blatantly obvious). I had an issue with one poster being offensive and I told him so. But I didn't complain about the post or accuse him of being racist. But maybe others did.
Tonto would buy a 279-fingered glove.
I trust that S-BD / S-BS has been banned from posting in this thread?
comment by caniggiaforforest (U6917)
If you check the transfer gossip, they are still using four.
---------------------------------------
Seriously, caniggia, we're Derby fans - do you think we ever bother checking the transfer gossip?
Someone say racist!!
Anyway Cannigia, how did Billy get on in his first game. I heard you all had to get there early cos billy had to operate the turnstyles and mow the grass before the team talk.
Rev is raving about it I see.
yeah fair enough. I don't know why I bother checking it either
I wasn't there Iwas (or was I). No I definitely wasn't.
So I can't say how well he did. We got a point, sounded like we deserved the win but as usual we couldn't convert the chances. It was a game that probably would have ended 1-1 under SoD but under McLeish we would have lost so there's some progress I suppose.
Really Cannig- Didn't MeLeish draw with high flying Palace in his first game, whereas Billy could only draw with lowly Bolton even though the place was buzzing.
Hardly the return of the king is it.
I suppose if you're looking only at one game then yes McLeish did better in terms of getting a point against a better side. But we were lucky to draw with Palace and deserved to beat Bolton.
Jeez.. Caniggia AND Iwas discussing stuff..?
A new KKK chapter in the offing, is it?
Do you read many KKK books?
Sign in if you want to comment
6 fingered gloves?
Page 1 of 2
posted on 18/2/13
Four, that coincindentally is the number of games since you beat us. Also the number of mangers you have had since the Kuwaiti megalomaniac took you over. Also probably the number of working brain cells he has. Possibly the number of games Billy Davies will be in charge at Forest.
How about no fingered gloves, zero being the number of premiership points Forest have accumulated this millenium, or 10 fingered, 10 being the number of players Derby require to beat you over 90 minutes.
I think you might find from medical records that polydactylyl is a more frequent occurence in rural Nottinghamshire than Derbyshire and is very common in Lincolnshire.
posted on 18/2/13
I like what you've done there Spartacus although I seriously doubt any medical records anywhere include dinosaurs!
Also, how about an 11 fingered glove? I wonder what that could refer to
posted on 18/2/13
What do the in-breds down the A5-2 do about the webbing between their fingers?
posted on 18/2/13
The only person I knew who had webbing between their fingers came from Bulwell.
While we are on about numbers does 6 plus the number of times Tonto has seen Forest = 6?
Many years ago I did a PGCE and there was a midwife from Grimsby on the course. As part of the course we had to describe what we did in our jobs (this was for FE/HE). She described how she presented a baby to the parents after it was born. One of the things she said was "we have tied a string round the extra little toe and it should drop off in a few days". Additional digits are more common than many realise as the gene which produces them is dominant.
posted on 18/2/13
FYI
It's a three-fingered glove; four-fingered gloves are what normal people wear.
Trust this helps, thicko
posted on 18/2/13
You are saying the Simpson's aren't normal people 666?
posted on 18/2/13
666 - I trust your comment is aimed at the Telegraph journalist who wrote the original article?
posted on 18/2/13
If you look Tonto the Telegraph journalist talks about a three fingered glove. How about a big oops, I should have checked (or should that I should of checked in the modern moronic use of English).
posted on 18/2/13
FYI
It's a three-fingered glove; four-fingered gloves are what normal people wear.
Trust this helps, thicko
---------------
Harsh. The article clearly said 'four fingered' this morning and has been edited to three-fingered. If you check the transfer gossip, they are still using four.
Also:
The English word "finger" has two senses, even in the context of appendages of a single typical human hand:
- Any of the five digits.
- Any of the five terminal members of the hand, especially those other than the thumb.
It's a bit like saying someone is in-bred if they have 6 fingers. Or do you think it's odd for people to have 5 fingers 666?
posted on 18/2/13
Yes our language is not consistent. When we talk anatomically we normally talk about 4 fingers and a thumb but sartorially we tend to think of gloves as having 5 fingers.
posted on 18/2/13
"I meant four-fingered, er three-fingered, er five-fingered.."
If you're thinking about penning a WUM article in future, do yourself a favour and don't, Spacktard
posted on 18/2/13
Thank you Spartacus.
You're angrier than usual today 666. Chill out pal, don't let it get to you.
posted on 18/2/13
It reads with more venom than was intended, caniggia!
I obviously don't like your racist viewpoints but I respect your right to air them within the boundaries of the House Rules
posted on 18/2/13
Oh ok, I'll let you off then.
Is you calling me racist your attempt at a wum? I suppose if people from Derby were a race then that would be a fair accusation.
posted on 18/2/13
Oh, I'm sorry; I thought 'racist' was the standard response on 606 now for any comments anyone doesn't like.
Just on the Forest boards then, is it?
posted on 18/2/13
Hey hey hey. I didn't accuse anyone of being racist. In fact I said it was a dangerous and offensive thing to go around accusing people of being racist (unless it is blatantly obvious). I had an issue with one poster being offensive and I told him so. But I didn't complain about the post or accuse him of being racist. But maybe others did.
posted on 18/2/13
Tonto would buy a 279-fingered glove.
I trust that S-BD / S-BS has been banned from posting in this thread?
posted on 18/2/13
comment by caniggiaforforest (U6917)
If you check the transfer gossip, they are still using four.
---------------------------------------
Seriously, caniggia, we're Derby fans - do you think we ever bother checking the transfer gossip?
posted on 18/2/13
Someone say racist!!
Anyway Cannigia, how did Billy get on in his first game. I heard you all had to get there early cos billy had to operate the turnstyles and mow the grass before the team talk.
Rev is raving about it I see.
posted on 18/2/13
yeah fair enough. I don't know why I bother checking it either
posted on 18/2/13
I wasn't there Iwas (or was I). No I definitely wasn't.
So I can't say how well he did. We got a point, sounded like we deserved the win but as usual we couldn't convert the chances. It was a game that probably would have ended 1-1 under SoD but under McLeish we would have lost so there's some progress I suppose.
posted on 18/2/13
Really Cannig- Didn't MeLeish draw with high flying Palace in his first game, whereas Billy could only draw with lowly Bolton even though the place was buzzing.
Hardly the return of the king is it.
posted on 18/2/13
I suppose if you're looking only at one game then yes McLeish did better in terms of getting a point against a better side. But we were lucky to draw with Palace and deserved to beat Bolton.
posted on 18/2/13
Jeez.. Caniggia AND Iwas discussing stuff..?
A new KKK chapter in the offing, is it?
posted on 18/2/13
Do you read many KKK books?
Page 1 of 2