Conned the club out of £350K.
Embarrassed the club over its silence on Uighars
Refused a pay cut and exposed the clubs shambles
Embarrassed the club over its redundancy of a fackin mascot.
It really is Mesut Ozil FC
I doubt It was Ozil who revealed that himself refused to take the paycut. If I remember correctly, it was Cross who came with the scoop.
Few months further down the line, the identity of the two other remain unclear. It was clear strategy by the club to leak the name.
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 4 minutes ago
If it was rivals I wouldn't care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would banter though
(Don't think anyone is losing sleep apart from Merse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats just taken as club rivalry. It only really becomes a story when our own fans start taking the moral high ground. Its just sanctimonious cods wallop.
Spurs took a loan totalling £185m from us, tax payers and then splurged on signings. But cause there was no self righteous indignation, its forgotten.
comment by We got our Arsenal back (U10012)
posted 2 minutes ago
I doubt It was Ozil who revealed that himself refused to take the paycut. If I remember correctly, it was Cross who came with the scoop.
Few months further down the line, the identity of the two other remain unclear. It was clear strategy by the club to leak the name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/11350265/mesut-ozil-arsenal-pay-cut-agent/
J99 you obsess over this govt loan... It was freely offered and taken up because of the lower interest
It wasn't some bailout
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 28 seconds ago
J99 you obsess over this govt loan... It was freely offered and taken up because of the lower interest
It wasn't some bailout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And there you are defending Spurs. If it wasn't a bailout why do you take it in the first place?
Why take any loan?
Why take the loan with the best interest to repayment terms?
Appreciate that if arsenal did the same we might see a different narrative
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 4 seconds ago
Why take any loan?
Why take the loan with the best interest to repayment terms?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that was the case you get state aide which is illegal. These loans weren't on offer to everyone. Corporations had to prove that they needed to use the lender of last resort because the market had turned them down.
There was nothing about last resort
They just had to prove they were a UK incorporated company and create significant revenue in the UK but could demonstrate they were in sound financial health prior to the shock
Sonic they Bank of England was satisfied with that I wouldn't imagine they're in danger of folding anytime soon
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/covid-corporate-financing-facility
Have a good ol' read
MK this is not a thread for your kind to have disagreements with good honest gooners
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 19 minutes ago
Nope 🚮
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ban me FFS
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 20 minutes ago
Nope 🚮
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 22 minutes ago
Nope 🚮
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Squads don't have to be named until 20th October. Plenty of time for a couple of our non-HGs to get season ending injuries.
comment by MKspur ツ - The Fountain of Knowledge (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 4 minutes ago
If it was rivals I wouldn't care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would banter though
(Don't think anyone is losing sleep apart from Merse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats just taken as club rivalry. It only really becomes a story when our own fans start taking the moral high ground. Its just sanctimonious cods wallop.
Spurs took a loan totalling £185m from us, tax payers and then splurged on signings. But cause there was no self righteous indignation, its forgotten.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do realise BoE isn’t run by taxpayers money right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What money is it then?
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
There was nothing about last resort
They just had to prove they were a UK incorporated company and create significant revenue in the UK but could demonstrate they were in sound financial health prior to the shock
Sonic they Bank of England was satisfied with that I wouldn't imagine they're in danger of folding anytime soon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No m8. It was lender of last resort. They had to prove they were viable business had it not been for covid and then the market had turned them down before BoE got involved. I'll find you the rules. We advise on it.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/apply-for-the-covid-19-corporate-financing-facility
"This scheme will support your company if it’s been affected by a short-term funding squeeze, and allow you to finance your short-term liabilities."
Key phrase here m8. "if it’s been affected by a short-term funding squeeze". That means you are viable business if it was not for Covid but you cannot get money from the market ie funding squeeze. We specifically advise sme's but one of our clients has a lot of shops so were technically just bigger than medium. They were hunting for help under the same scheme that applied to larger businesses during April/May. If you think back at the time a huge bottleneck developed.
*If you think back at the time a huge bottleneck developed because banks who were tasked to administer the scheme were getting stuck on credit ratings and proof that companies could not attain loans from other sources. It was not the free for fall that media pretended it was and nor should it have been!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
"Eligibility
Companies – and their finance subsidiaries – that make a material contribution to the UK economy are able to participate.
Check your eligibility on the Bank of England website."
The gov site links to the Bank of England site which is the link I posted earlier that details the eligibility I stated and which supercedes your cherry picked addendum 🚮
Sign in if you want to comment
The Arsenal Thread
Page 22181 of 30209
22182 | 22183 | 22184 | 22185 | 22186
posted on 6/10/20
Conned the club out of £350K.
Embarrassed the club over its silence on Uighars
Refused a pay cut and exposed the clubs shambles
Embarrassed the club over its redundancy of a fackin mascot.
It really is Mesut Ozil FC
posted on 6/10/20
I doubt It was Ozil who revealed that himself refused to take the paycut. If I remember correctly, it was Cross who came with the scoop.
Few months further down the line, the identity of the two other remain unclear. It was clear strategy by the club to leak the name.
posted on 6/10/20
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 4 minutes ago
If it was rivals I wouldn't care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would banter though
(Don't think anyone is losing sleep apart from Merse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats just taken as club rivalry. It only really becomes a story when our own fans start taking the moral high ground. Its just sanctimonious cods wallop.
Spurs took a loan totalling £185m from us, tax payers and then splurged on signings. But cause there was no self righteous indignation, its forgotten.
posted on 6/10/20
comment by We got our Arsenal back (U10012)
posted 2 minutes ago
I doubt It was Ozil who revealed that himself refused to take the paycut. If I remember correctly, it was Cross who came with the scoop.
Few months further down the line, the identity of the two other remain unclear. It was clear strategy by the club to leak the name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/11350265/mesut-ozil-arsenal-pay-cut-agent/
posted on 6/10/20
J99 you obsess over this govt loan... It was freely offered and taken up because of the lower interest
It wasn't some bailout
posted on 6/10/20
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 28 seconds ago
J99 you obsess over this govt loan... It was freely offered and taken up because of the lower interest
It wasn't some bailout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And there you are defending Spurs. If it wasn't a bailout why do you take it in the first place?
posted on 6/10/20
Why take any loan?
Why take the loan with the best interest to repayment terms?
posted on 6/10/20
Appreciate that if arsenal did the same we might see a different narrative
posted on 6/10/20
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 4 seconds ago
Why take any loan?
Why take the loan with the best interest to repayment terms?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that was the case you get state aide which is illegal. These loans weren't on offer to everyone. Corporations had to prove that they needed to use the lender of last resort because the market had turned them down.
posted on 6/10/20
There was nothing about last resort
They just had to prove they were a UK incorporated company and create significant revenue in the UK but could demonstrate they were in sound financial health prior to the shock
Sonic they Bank of England was satisfied with that I wouldn't imagine they're in danger of folding anytime soon
posted on 6/10/20
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/covid-corporate-financing-facility
Have a good ol' read
posted on 6/10/20
posted on 6/10/20
MK this is not a thread for your kind to have disagreements with good honest gooners
posted on 6/10/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/10/20
Nope 🚮
posted on 6/10/20
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 19 minutes ago
Nope 🚮
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ban me FFS
posted on 6/10/20
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 20 minutes ago
Nope 🚮
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 6/10/20
Please.
posted on 6/10/20
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 22 minutes ago
Nope 🚮
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 6/10/20
Squads don't have to be named until 20th October. Plenty of time for a couple of our non-HGs to get season ending injuries.
posted on 6/10/20
comment by MKspur ツ - The Fountain of Knowledge (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 4 minutes ago
If it was rivals I wouldn't care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would banter though
(Don't think anyone is losing sleep apart from Merse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats just taken as club rivalry. It only really becomes a story when our own fans start taking the moral high ground. Its just sanctimonious cods wallop.
Spurs took a loan totalling £185m from us, tax payers and then splurged on signings. But cause there was no self righteous indignation, its forgotten.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do realise BoE isn’t run by taxpayers money right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What money is it then?
posted on 6/10/20
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
There was nothing about last resort
They just had to prove they were a UK incorporated company and create significant revenue in the UK but could demonstrate they were in sound financial health prior to the shock
Sonic they Bank of England was satisfied with that I wouldn't imagine they're in danger of folding anytime soon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No m8. It was lender of last resort. They had to prove they were viable business had it not been for covid and then the market had turned them down before BoE got involved. I'll find you the rules. We advise on it.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/apply-for-the-covid-19-corporate-financing-facility
"This scheme will support your company if it’s been affected by a short-term funding squeeze, and allow you to finance your short-term liabilities."
Key phrase here m8. "if it’s been affected by a short-term funding squeeze". That means you are viable business if it was not for Covid but you cannot get money from the market ie funding squeeze. We specifically advise sme's but one of our clients has a lot of shops so were technically just bigger than medium. They were hunting for help under the same scheme that applied to larger businesses during April/May. If you think back at the time a huge bottleneck developed.
posted on 6/10/20
*If you think back at the time a huge bottleneck developed because banks who were tasked to administer the scheme were getting stuck on credit ratings and proof that companies could not attain loans from other sources. It was not the free for fall that media pretended it was and nor should it have been!
posted on 6/10/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/10/20
"Eligibility
Companies – and their finance subsidiaries – that make a material contribution to the UK economy are able to participate.
Check your eligibility on the Bank of England website."
The gov site links to the Bank of England site which is the link I posted earlier that details the eligibility I stated and which supercedes your cherry picked addendum 🚮
Page 22181 of 30209
22182 | 22183 | 22184 | 22185 | 22186