In what way is that sensationalist? It's an entirely accurate portrayal of the story. It's not like they referred to it as a scandal, anti-doping regulations obviously have a wide scope. If people can't be bothered to read the first couple of lines of an article it's their own fault for getting carried away.

Well if the club doesn't keep the anti doping up to date then they can't carry out checks to keep the sport clean!

What's to say the club hasn't deliberately not updated the players locations (not saying they have) because they didn't want them to know?

lol stupid op.

The story is obviously inaccurate anyway. Surely they can't mean The Club That Can Do No Wrong.

Imagine the fun alcky Brazil and Durham will have with this tomorrow.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

They should be forced to play in a full stadium.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 2 minutes ago
They should be forced to play in a full stadium.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't talk about that after last night at the theatre and joses comments lad!

Easy pickings

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 2 minutes ago
They should be forced to play in a full stadium.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't talk about that after last night at the theatre and joses comments lad!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you would, you talk about United every opportunity you get.

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 4 minutes ago
Easy pickings
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Ruiney (U1005)

posted 37 minutes ago

They should be forced to play in a full stadium.

----------------------------------------------------

In an League Cup Semi-Final?

Thought Cheaty are a financial dopers but it has proved they are physically doped club.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Admįn3 (U8613)
posted 47 minutes ago
Thought Cheaty are a financial dopers but it has proved they are physically doped club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let fans talk that actually go maf stick to toilet cleaning

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Admįn3 (U8613)
posted 47 minutes ago
Thought Cheaty are a financial dopers but it has proved they are physically doped club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let fans talk that actually go maf stick to toilet cleaning

----

Toilets cleaning is for dopeycunts like you.

Dopey club dopey fans.

Sources at the FA and City insist it is not a case of an individual player going “missing” when required for a drugs test – as in the case of former Manchester United and England star Rio Ferdinand in 2004.

Ferdinand claimed he “forgot” to attend the test after training and instead went shopping. He was banned for eight months and missed the FA Cup final and Euro 2004.

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/753060/Manchester-City-news-club-face-anti-doping-fine

You want dopey try bringing a special fa cup shirt out wrong then getting battered and going out.

West Ham and it's branding showing us a bright future for match dodging super fans who clean toilets for a living.

🚽 it ain't going to clean itself lad get too it👍🤢🤢🤢

First City were rightly convicted of financial doping.

Now, there is an indictment of drug doping.

Dopers inside and outside.

No there isn't read the actual article before making another comment

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 12 minutes ago
No there isn't read the actual article before making another comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think it is you who cannot read.

Manchester have been indicted by the FA over anti-doping rules (on three occasions): On one occasion doping officials turned up at City’s training ground to hold random tests with more than one player and were left furious when they were not there. On another occasion they went to a player’s hotel only to find he had checked out and moved into a house.

A spokesman for the FA said last night: “It is alleged the club (City) failed to ensure that their ‘Club Whereabouts’ information was accurate, contrary to Regulation 14(d).”

This is not irresponsible or sensationalist journalism as the OP wrongly opines; it is responsible journalism.

Irresponsible journalism would be one deducing that there is a club-sponspored 'systematic' doping that permeates Manchester city. After all, to miss once is accident, twice maybe a coincidence.

Three times is an incident! Something fishy there.

There's nothing wrong with the headline