That's a sizeable chunk of what your club is valued at, even Levy is not that daft

I wouldn't sell Kane for 1bn, at the end of the day I don't see any of the money, Kane is THFC through and through and the complete CF.

Kane staying at us and doing an Alan Shearer would personally mean more to me than any title bought with mercenaries.

You may have been a better team for a couple of yrs. means nothing in reality. You still can't win anything and you are nowhere near as good a football club as Manchester United

Isn't he on a long contract? It's a ridiculous amount to ward off united. Kane is a classic united striker I'd say but why take a step down to them. Spurs are genuinely the best TEAM in the division why would he even want to move away is the first stumbling block not the fee it would take to get him

That's from an Everton fan btw

I'd sell him for that yes

Manc fans make me laugh as well, can't take criticism and have a hysterical sense of misguided grandeur.

Could replicate a RAWK meltdown account with some of the comments on here.

IF kane was sold this would be the biggest blow ever to spurs fans/the club and I doubt it would recover in any short space of time regardless of an over inflated fee.....

as above totally wrong message not just cos he's the spearhead of the team...but also and more importantly what he represents to the fans.

For 200m you'd have to sell him, purely because he isn't truly worth 100m - it would be the most ridiculous transfer in the history of time.

Two hundred million pounds, for one player.

As absolutely brilliant as he is, that's stupid.

But it will never ever happen, Utd would pay that much, we don't want to Sell, Harry loves spurs (and right now it would be a backwards step), so it's a non story really.

comment by NotSoMagicJuande (U1913)
posted 57 seconds ago
For 200m you'd have to sell him, purely because he isn't truly worth 100m - it would be the most ridiculous transfer in the history of time.

Two hundred million pounds, for one player.

As absolutely brilliant as he is, that's stupid.

But it will never ever happen, Utd would pay that much, we don't want to Sell, Harry loves spurs (and right now it would be a backwards step), so it's a non story really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good post

You'd be stupid not to sell at that price. Firstly you could surely get somebody as good or as close to for £100m or below who would score 25 goals a season and secondly you'd have another £100m to buy players for other positions, all without actually dipping into your own funds.

200 mill . I hope we tell to fack off and come back with a real bid .

Ask em if they want Sissoko

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 17 minutes ago
You may have been a better team for a couple of yrs. means nothing in reality. You still can't win anything and you are nowhere near as good a football club as Manchester United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Means exactly that, we have been better than you for the past couple of years and you are now chasing around our best players in an attempt to catch up. Would never suggest we are a bigger, richer or historically more successful than United. No idea what as good a club means ? The united team I watched last season weren't very good, they were pretty boring !

£200m for Kane

He's worth about 50 thou

to be a minimum of 200mln for us to even considering it.... Simple question... would you sell for that kind of money?

-------

of course

Every player has a price

comment by NotSoMagicJuande (U1913)
posted 52 minutes ago
For 200m you'd have to sell him, purely because he isn't truly worth 100m - it would be the most ridiculous transfer in the history of time.

Two hundred million pounds, for one player.

As absolutely brilliant as he is, that's stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Kane is stupidly brilliant

Two hundred million and four pounds, then I might be interested.

Just two hundred million? Pfft, don't waste my time.

I wouldnt sell at any price, a big lump of cash in the bank is no guarantee we will improve as a team and if we are serious about wanting to win things, we can not sell our best players to a currently inferior rival.

I am in no doubt United would love Kane but any Spurs player would be a fool to leave any time soon, the only thing United can offer them is more money and the misery of playing for the Special Once.

And any United Mug saying Kane is not worth 100m, please remember you have recently paid 90m for the French Zokora, a player that would be no where near the Spurs starting XI.

He`s worth at least 150m imo, if he was for sale, which he isnt.

Special Once

comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 17 minutes ago
You may have been a better team for a couple of yrs. means nothing in reality. You still can't win anything and you are nowhere near as good a football club as Manchester United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Means exactly that, we have been better than you for the past couple of years and you are now chasing around our best players in an attempt to catch up. Would never suggest we are a bigger, richer or historically more successful than United. No idea what as good a club means ? The united team I watched last season weren't very good, they were pretty boring !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chasing around for your players.....are we?
Name a player we gave put a bid in for?

Billy, carry on calling him the special once, I know you like it but just remember, whatever you think of him, he won 2 trophies in his first season at United

Jesus Christ. There will be clubs bidding 5 mil for the fecking tea lady one day.