comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 9 seconds ago
I've no problem with you counting them but I think most outside of Celtic would agree it's a bit disingenuous claiming them with no gers there.

Certainly not as a wum to bears cos we weren't there. Sorry if that disappoints you

Just like you wouldn't be upset at us crowing about the challenge cup win, you weren't in it so don't give a fook
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So we should count them but not claim them?

ffs

This means you shouldn't count your ECW cup following that logic. Nor any titles wins before we were formed. Oops. There goes 54.



Now answer my questions.

"The major title in Scotland and the challenge cup are the same?"


The point being whose in it rather than level obviously .

How does it go again...


Whoooosh

"comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 9 seconds ago
I've no problem with you counting them but I think most outside of Celtic would agree it's a bit disingenuous claiming them with no gers there.

Certainly not as a wum to bears cos we weren't there. Sorry if that disappoints you

Just like you wouldn't be upset at us crowing about the challenge cup win, you weren't in it so don't give a fook
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So we should count them but not claim them?

ffs

This means you shouldn't count your ECW cup following that logic. Nor any titles wins before we were formed. Oops. There goes 54.



Now answer my questions. "


You can count them if you want, makes no difference to me tbh

comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 33 seconds ago
"comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 9 seconds ago
I've no problem with you counting them but I think most outside of Celtic would agree it's a bit disingenuous claiming them with no gers there.

Certainly not as a wum to bears cos we weren't there. Sorry if that disappoints you

Just like you wouldn't be upset at us crowing about the challenge cup win, you weren't in it so don't give a fook
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So we should count them but not claim them?

ffs

This means you shouldn't count your ECW cup following that logic. Nor any titles wins before we were formed. Oops. There goes 54.



Now answer my questions. "


You can count them if you want, makes no difference to me tbh
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I beg to differ. It seems to make a lot of difference to many bears.

Why else worry about and post about them? Or give it the big huzzah when Mr King blurts it out like a crazy man?



Anyway.

6 IN A ROW.

As I say, I've no probs with you counting them but it's not something that will wind me up much in the same way as us winning the challenge cup has no relevance to you smelly tims

comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, I've no probs with you counting them but it's not something that will wind me up much in the same way as us winning the challenge cup has no relevance to you smelly tims
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh no. You have us all wrong. It shouldn't wind you up.

You should just acknowledge and applaud your champions is all

Steady on

I remember you guys applauding us as champions many ti....ooops

comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 41 seconds ago
Steady on

I remember you guys applauding us as champions many ti....ooops
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Right. I have to go now.

Later

Those lavvys won't clean themselves

The point being whose in it rather than level obviously .

===

And my point is...what difference would those Rangers teams have made, when they were continually pumped by SPFL teams in cup games?

And you were Hibsed.

"The point being whose in it rather than level obviously .

===

And my point is...what difference would those Rangers teams have made, when they were continually pumped by SPFL teams in cup games?

And you were Hibsed."


And as I've already told you, your "point" is irrelevant

And as I've already told you, your "point" is irrelevant

===

Have I missed that?


The point is, those Rangers teams under McCoisty, McDowally, McCally and the magician...could only win one Petrofac cup.

What difference would they have made to the top league?

Irrelevant , nobody is saying they'd make a difference.

Going round in circles here

I've no problem with you counting them but I think most outside of Celtic would agree it's a bit disingenuous claiming them with no gers there.

===

What do you find disingenuous ?