or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 26 comments are related to an article called:

Well Done Chelsea

Page 1 of 2

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 9/7/17

100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?

comment by Superb (U6486)

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, he's been living under the rock recently

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The chequebook needs to come out otherwise you'll be left behind.

posted on 9/7/17

Have to agree. Chelsea have done utd like a kipper here

posted on 9/7/17

Given that United pretty much print money I don't think any united fans or staff actually care.

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Red pixels (U11867)
posted 1 minute ago
Given that United pretty much print money I don't think any united fans or staff actually care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I'd rather line the Glazers pockets with the absurd amount of money we make rather thsn spending it on players.

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Red pixels (U11867)
posted 1 minute ago
Given that United pretty much print money I don't think any united fans or staff actually care.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I'd rather line the Glazers pockets with the absurd amount of money we make rather thsn spending it on players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, would much prefer not to see my money invested in the club

posted on 9/7/17

If only we had kroenke to hold us back

comment by Ron (U1646)

posted on 9/7/17

Pocket change, massive money to smaller clubs though, so you can understand the outbursts

comment by Superb (U6486)

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The chequebook needs to come out otherwise you'll be left behind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Criticised if we spend, criticised if we don't.

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The chequebook needs to come out otherwise you'll be left behind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Left behind like we were supposed to be last season? I'll take that no problem

posted on 9/7/17

Have Chelsea been playing some kind of bluff during all this then?

Fuxakes 😂😂😂

They were just outbid is all. It happens. So what's their target now exactly?

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all relative.

Chelsea used to be the big spenders.

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all relative.

Chelsea used to be the big spenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now a bigger boy who makes its own money are in town. And the little children don't like it

posted on 9/7/17

Lukaku

comment by Bov (U6696)

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all relative.

Chelsea used to be the big spenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now a bigger boy who makes its own money are in town. And the little children don't like it
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Big boy? Lets see on the pitch before you get ahead of yourselves. Still as long as you convince yourselves youre not trying to buy the league, all your players are from the youth team and Jose has still got it, what could possibly go wrong?

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all relative.

Chelsea used to be the big spenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now a bigger boy who makes its own money are in town. And the little children don't like it
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Big boy? Lets see on the pitch before you get ahead of yourselves. Still as long as you convince yourselves youre not trying to buy the league, all your players are from the youth team and Jose has still got it, what could possibly go wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly we are a much bigger club than you. Much bigger

Secondly every club tries to buy the league. Especially in England

Thirdly we still produce and play far more youngsters than you lot do in our first team.

comment by House (U17162)

posted on 9/7/17

Meh Man United makes that money back in a few months in revenue anyways. There's a reason we spend 57 million on Di Maria, 89 on Pogba, 90 maybe on Lukaku, our commercial revenues dwarfs any other sports club on the planet bar none. It's no biggy.. We'll spend 80 million on another player next summer and the summer after, who caaaaaaares (unless you're any other football club!)

comment by House (U17162)

posted on 9/7/17

It's not as if we need a billionaire to fund us either!

comment by Bov (U6696)

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all relative.

Chelsea used to be the big spenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now a bigger boy who makes its own money are in town. And the little children don't like it
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Big boy? Lets see on the pitch before you get ahead of yourselves. Still as long as you convince yourselves youre not trying to buy the league, all your players are from the youth team and Jose has still got it, what could possibly go wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly we are a much bigger club than you. Much bigger

Secondly every club tries to buy the league. Especially in England

Thirdly we still produce and play far more youngsters than you lot do in our first team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only children argue on club size and those who have nothing else to throw into the debate. Still you're rattled because its a case of de ja vu after the wasted money on Pogba Jose doing the same with Lukaku.

Good you concede every club tries to buy the league. I'm older than most and remember the big buys bought in the 80's chasing the holy grail that was always out of reach for Man U.

Producing more players. Is that the depth of your boasts these days?

posted on 9/7/17

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 minutes ago
100m ooo-wee that's a lot.

Remember when Chelsea used to be the big spenders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We've never spent close to that on a player. Torres at £50 million was our most expensive ever transfer and apart from him we've never paid more than around the £30 million mark for a player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all relative.

Chelsea used to be the big spenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now a bigger boy who makes its own money are in town. And the little children don't like it
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Big boy? Lets see on the pitch before you get ahead of yourselves. Still as long as you convince yourselves youre not trying to buy the league, all your players are from the youth team and Jose has still got it, what could possibly go wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly we are a much bigger club than you. Much bigger

Secondly every club tries to buy the league. Especially in England

Thirdly we still produce and play far more youngsters than you lot do in our first team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dobt think any Chelsea fan has ever claimed we are bigger than United. Unlike you lot who genuinely believe you are bigger than Madrid, Munich, Milan and Barca

posted on 9/7/17

Thirdly we still produce and play far more youngsters than you lot do in our first team.

none of our youngsters are allowed to play for your first but 90% of them are better than pogba

posted on 9/7/17

lets face it...of all the belgian players Lukaku is probably worth the least of them all...Hazard De Bruyne Courtois Naingolain Alderwereild Kompany......come on almost 100mill for Lukaku Joker has been played by Everton and you lot suckered into it

comment by Hector (U3606)

posted on 9/7/17

Lukaku has the build and ability to be the new Drogba.

Jose loves Drogba.

Page 1 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment